Nationalised Ferguson Marine has been warned by ministers about the need for accurate forecasting over the cost of Scotland's ferry fiasco - after a new wave of delays were signalled because of an "emerging risk" over the use of so-called green fuel.
The Scottish Government has been told by Ferguson Marine that there have been delays to the supply of vital piping systems to the first of the two vesses at the centre of the scandal that should have been taken place at the end of 2023.
But the Scottish Government has been told that the installation will not be complete till the middle of March and that there would be a further ten weeks of testing required meaning a handover would now be put off further potentially till June.
It came after the nationalised yard company identified at the end of last year that there had been an "emerging risk" to the liquefied natural gas (LNG) system on Glen Sannox.
It meant that the entire system required specialist cryo-steels to be installed.
It has meant the symbolic launch date of the second vessel Glen Rosa has had to be put off from March 12 to April 9.
READ MORE: Island told to prepare for food shortages in CalMac ferry row
The yard has said it allows for critical work on Glen Sannox in March.
Now it has emerged that wellbeing economy secretary Neil Gray has told the Ferguson Marine chief executive David Tydeman of the "need to control costs wherever possible" and has told the chairman Andrew Miller about the "requirement for accurate forecasting".
The message came in a response seen by the Herald to the new delays and costs rise and comes as the much-delayed Glen Sannox ferry was preparing to sail under its own power on February 13 in the Clyde between the Port Glasgow shipyard and Gourock.
The ferries were lauded by then First Minister Nicola Sturgeon as the 'sustainable' ferries that would "contribute to Scotland's world-leading climate change goals".
Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa were to be able to operate on LNG which the Scottish Government ferry owners Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd said was "significantly cleaner and will help to reduce emissions to meet ambitious Scottish Government targets".
They were hailed as a step towards a greener future for Scotland's state owned CalMac ferry fleet as they were to be the first UK-built ships capable of running off LNG as well as conventional diesel.
CMAL has previously said that the two vessels would reduce the carbon footprint of the ferry fleet by 25%.
But the Herald revealed that the European Federation for Transport and Environment, commonly referred to as Transport & Environment, a European umbrella for non-governmental organisations working in the field of transport and the environment, promoting sustainable transport in Europe believe the ferry engines chosen are the worst for methane greenhouse gas leakage.
They say using LNG as a marine fuel goes against the Global Methane Pledge launched at the United Nations Climate Change Conference, commonly known as COP26, in Glasgow in November 2021 that aims to reduce methane emissions by 30% by 2030 and is against advice from institutions such as the World Bank.
Both ferries, Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa were due online in the first half of 2018, with one initially to serve Arran and the other to serve the Skye triangle routes to North Uist and Harris, but are at least six years late, with costs expected to be quadruple the original £97m contract. It has been confirmed that both are now to serve Arran.
Glen Rosa was meant to be delivered to CalMac in August 2018, but that is currently scheduled for May 2025. Glen Sannox, was launched by Nicola Sturgeon nearly seven years ago and was due for delivery in the spring.
But the dates of arrival have been constantly in a state of flux as their construction has been plagued by design challenges, cost overruns and delays.
Mr Tydeman has told ministers that the LNG issues will have a bearing on the final handover of Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa as well as overall costs to complete impacts for both ships.
And Mr Gray has told Edward Mountain and Richard Leonard, the convenors of the Scottish Parliament transport and public audit committees that they were "concerning developments" and that he was "extremely disappointed" by the latest issues with the ferries.
Any extra costs, are not guaranteed to be met by the Scottish Government which is currently carrying out "due diligence" over the new wave of cost implications.
A ferry user group official said that the Scottish Government warning was as "pointless" as the due diligence "gesture".
He said: "Ferguson Marine are more than aware that they have to keep the costs under scrutiny but it has not stopped the costs going up and up and up. So it all seems like empty gestures to try and appease those who are angry at the way the delivery of the ferries continues to be handled.
"The Scottish Government has made it clear that they are willing to pump the extra millions into delivering these ferries no matter whether it is value for money. They have already made their political decision to get this job finished. The idea that they would pull out now seems far fetched when you consider how close we appear to be to finally seeing Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa carrying customers and god knows we need them."
Mr Gray gave a rare written authority in May, last year, to plough ahead with supporting the delivery of the two ferries saying it is the "platform upon which future success can be built".
He said that non-delivery of the ferries at nationalised Ferguson Marine (Port Glasgow) would put the very future of the yard and the jobs it supports "in jeopardy".
It heralded the sanctioning of an extra £72.6m in capital spending on the ships. That was made up of £15m approved in December, last year and a further £57.6m for 2023/24.
When further delays and cost rises were indicated a December alert over "supplier issues" in relation to LNG he warned Mr Tydeman of what he called "significant challenges" facing Scottish Government in terms of spending.
Eyebrows have already been raised about the logistics of getting LNG to Scotland – while four new vessels being built in Turkey will not be powered by the 'green' fuel at all.
According to a 2022 Scottish Government briefing, LNG will have to be shipped from the Isle of Grain in Kent – a near 500 mile journey by road.
CalMac has been told that it is not yet feasible to use LNG-powered trucks due to the size of the fuel tanks required and a lack of refuelling infrastructure.
The adoption of LNG as a fuel by ships stems from the fact that LNG contains less carbon and little sulphur compared to traditional marine fuels. LNG can thus lower CO2 and sulphur oxides (SOx) emissions that ships would normally emit. LNG marine engines are also set up in a way that emits less nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions.
When LNG is burned as a fuel, it releases energy and produces carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapour, along with smaller amounts of other pollutants.
While CO2 is a significant greenhouse gas, burning methane releases less CO2 compared to other fossil fuels, making in theory LNG a relatively cleaner-burning fuel.
Transport & Environment say that while the industry was quick to tout the benefits of LNG, the relatively damning methane slippage problem was swept under the carpet, as well as leakages from on-shore infrastructure associated with the fuel's production, transportation and storage.
If methane is released in air – even in very small amounts – its impact on climate change is disastrous.
Four new vessels being built to support CalMac's ageing ferry network being built in Turkey will be diesel/electric hybrid propulsion vessels – not LNG.
It means the LNG infrastructure plans will presently be for just two vessels – and there have been persistent questions over that as Ardrossan has not been ready for either the ferries on the fuel.
While there has been criticism over what has been described by some as an LNG planning 'farce', CalMac has begun moves to use Troon rather than Ardrossan for services to and from Arran from the summer of 2023. Because of the storage tank issues, the LNG will be pumped from trucks to the ship there.
A spokesperson for FMPG said: “We are currently evaluating the risks to further slippage on the handover date for Glen Sannox, any resulting impact onto [Glen Rosa] and the overall costs for both ships. "
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "The Wellbeing Economy Secretary has previously been clear with Parliament that inflationary and other significant pressures could increase the cost of completion.
“He was also clear that we would continue to keep these costs under review. Therefore further due diligence will be completed once the signalled re-forecast of costs has been completed by FMPG.
“The completion of these vessels received cross-party support, and still presents the fastest possible route to getting vital new lifeline services into service for our island communities while realising wider economic benefits to the Inverclyde area."
The Scottish Government said the Accountable Officer for the Scottish Government is bound by the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000, Section 15 to keep the regularity, propriety and efficient, economical and effective use of resources under review.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel