A breeder who illegally sold peregrine falcons for thousands of pounds has been fined £2,100.
Gary MacFarlane, 62, was also ordered to forfeit £5,220 in cash seized from his home address after he pled guilty at Livingston Sheriff Court to a number of offences under wildlife legislation concerning birds of prey.
MacFarlane admitted failing to complete the necessary documentation needed to sell the birds under the Control of Trade in Endangered Species Regulations 2018.
He admitted one charge of offering a peregrine for sale and two of selling falcons without an 'Article 10' certificate as required by law.
He also pled guilty to seven counts of making false declarations over the parentage of birds he bred at his home in Blackridge, West Lothian, in June 2021.
READ MORE: Skip hire boss ordered to pay £215k for environmental offences
The court heard how MacFarlane misled online buyers by providing them with letters indicating he had applied for Article 10 registration certificates for the birds.
MacFarlane’s offences came to light after bird of prey enthusiasts who answered his adverts on a bird trader website agreed to pay several thousand pounds to buy a number of peregrine falcons.
The court heard that each time MacFarlane insisted that he had applied to The Animal Plant and Health Agency (APHA) for the required A10 documentation.
However, the organisation received an anonymous tip-off in June 2021 that he was offering peregrine falcon tiercels for sale without an Article 10 being in place for the respective birds.
Iain Batho, who leads on Wildlife and Environmental Crime for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS, said: “It is highly important to preserve Scotland’s natural heritage, including the wildlife that forms part of it.
“Birds of prey are given strict protection by our law and this includes ensuring adherence to the strict rules that are in place for the lawful trade and registration of such animals.
“These rules are in place to ensure that the trade of birds of prey is carried out lawfully and to ensure the ongoing health and welfare of the bird of prey population in Scotland, both in the wild and in captivity.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here