Labour will not reinstate a cap on bonuses for bankers, Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves has confirmed.
The remarks, in an interview with the BBC, have been leapt on by political rivals.
The SNP pointed to comments made by Anas Sarwar last year when he described Liz Truss’s decision to scrap the "economically illiterate and morally bankrupt".
The limit was introduced in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to limit the eye-watering annual payouts. Even then it still allowed those in industry to receive a bonus of up to twice their annual salary.
The plan to remove the limit was announced in October 2022 by the then chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng in his mini-budget.
It was one of his few policies to survive.
READ MORE: Poll: Labour surges ahead to take biggest lead over SNP
In an interview with the BBC, Ms Reeves, a former Bank of England economist, said: “The cap on bankers’ bonuses was brought in in the aftermath of the global financial crisis and that was the right thing to do to rebuild the public finances.
“But that has gone now and we don’t have any intention of bringing that back.
“And as chancellor of the exchequer, I would want to be a champion of a successful and thriving financial services industry in the UK.”
Ms Reeves and other senior Labour figures had been vocal critics of the Tories’ decision to axe the cap during a cost-of-living crisis.
Just three months ago, the Shadow Chancellor criticised the move to allow unlimited bonuses to be earned again “in the midst of their cost-of-living crisis”.
Writing in the Daily Record following the mini-budget, Mr Sarwar said: “Last week’s mini-budget demonstrates how economically illiterate and morally bankrupt the Tories are.
“They have lifted the cap on bankers’ bonuses and given a tax cut to those at the very top.”
SNP MSP Kenneth Gibson said: "Labour coming out in support of Tory plans for unlimited bankers' bonuses will be a surprise to nobody - but yet again it shows how little influence their Scottish branch office has.
"Anas Sarwar said when the Tories lifted the cap on bankers' bonuses that it was 'economically illiterate and morally bankrupt.'
"It is now essential that Anas Sarwar, and the rest of Labour in Scotland, disown Rachel Reeves' plans, call out their Westminster bosses and stand up for working families in Scotland."
“It tells you everything you need to know about this Government,” she said.
READ MORE: Yousaf invites Starmer for 'respectful' Bute House independence talks
Ms Reeve's interview came as the party published a new plan on streamlining regulations in the city.
In her forward to the report, the Shadow Chancellor said Labour would be both “proudly pro-business, pro-worker” in government, with former FCA chairman Charles Randell calling it a blueprint for the “inclusive and sustainable growth of the financial sector”.
It sees the party take inspiration from Margaret Thatcher’s “Tell Sid” advertising campaign in the 1980s, most recently referenced by Chancellor Jeremy Hunt at the autumn statement, and which encouraged people to buy shares amid the privatisation of state-owned businesses.
Labour said it would “look to deliver a modern 'Tell Sid' campaign for retail ownership to highlight the value of British people supporting British businesses”.
Elsewhere in the plan, Labour said it would boost the development of regional financial centres, as well as exploring the expansion of longer-term fixed-rate mortgages.
Proposals also include an ambition to make the UK a “global standard-setter” for using AI in financial services, as well as backing for securities tokenisation and a central bank digital currency.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here