The Scottish Government has dropped plans to allow 16-year-olds to run for parliament.
It means that despite, the voting age for Holyrood and council elections being lowered ahead of the 2016 Scottish Parliament election, candidates will still need to be at least 18.
The decision not to extend candidacy rights to teenagers risks another spat between the SNP and the Scottish Greens.
The junior partners in the administration had called for an extension of candidacy rights to include everyone who can vote.
They secured a commitment in the Bute House Agreement to “promote legislation on electoral reform that enables more people to stand as candidates at Scottish Parliament and local government elections".
However, following a negative response to the consultation launched at the end of 2022, the Scottish Government’s new Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill, does not include the extension of candidacy rights to 16 and 17-year-olds.
READ MORE: Glasgow doctor: Fashion for wood burners harming children
In the policy memorandum published alongside the Bill, the Scottish Government said they had "reflected on the concerns" around the "potential exposure of young people to intimidation, both as candidates and as representatives and also practical issues concerning travel to the Scottish Parliament or council headquarters and working hours".
The memorandum said ministers had recognised "these concerns and has concluded that the time is not right for an extension of candidacy rights to 16 and 17-year-olds in this Bill".
The legislation does include a number of major reforms including allowing foreign nationals living and working in Scotland on a time-limited visa becoming eligible to stand as candidates in both Scottish Parliament and local government elections.
The legislation could also ban people from being MSPs if they are found guilty of intimidating MSPs, councillors, campaigners and electoral workers.
If passed it would also implement a number of changes to campaign rules for elections to “improve fairness, transparency, and controls against foreign spending.”
It will also reduce the amount campaigners ineligible to register with the Electoral Commission can spend to £700 in Scottish Parliament elections, and there would be changes to the rules around third-party campaigners.
The legislation would also take forward “a range of measures based on experience with Covid-19” to make it easier to re-schedule elections in an emergency.
Holyrood’s Presiding Officer would be able to postpone national Scottish Parliament elections by eight weeks.
Ministers would also be allowed “to provide funding to drive up democratic engagement".
READ MORE: Scottish Government defends 'appalling' £186k egg donor drive
The SNP Minister for Parliamentary Business George Adam said: “A robust electoral system is fundamental to the success of Scotland being an inclusive and vibrant democracy that makes everyone feel included and empowered.
“It is important that as many people in our society as possible feel they have an effective and independent means to hold government to account and feel encouraged take an active interest in politics and civic life including voting and standing for elections.
“Everyone living in Scotland should have a say on how Scotland is run and the wide-ranging measures in this Bill share the common thread of empowering everyone with an interest in improving democracy.”
Willie Sullivan, Senior Director of Electoral Reform Society Scotland, said they broadly welcomed the bill, describing it as a "tidying-up of our electoral system".
He added: "It’s a reminder that Scotland already has strong proportional voting systems in place, especially when compared to Westminster’s outdated and distorting First Past the Post system.
"However, our electoral arrangements need to be constantly updated to ensure they are working well for voters. So it is right that we have regular updates to our democratic systems.”
Green MSP Gillian Mackay said the parliament needed to be "truly representative".
"This Bill is an important part of that journey and in building a fairer and more democratic Scotland.
"Some of the reforms and the initiatives that are being identified could play a key role in making our politics more accessible, open and reflective of our country and communities.
"We still have work to do, but I'm excited about the steps we are taking and hope we can learn from them and build on them in future.
"For example, as the consultation analysis noted, there are still serious practical barriers to extending candidacy rights to 16 and 17-year-olds that we would like to overcome in time."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel