This article appears as part of the Unspun: Scottish Politics newsletter.
The SNP has decided who will win the next general election and, for once, a political party is not boasting about its own chances.
Humza Yousaf’s party is telling voters that Labour will win the general election, which could still be some 10 or 11 months away, and form the next UK government.
The First Minister has been unashamedly talking up Labour’s chances at the ballot box since Holyrood returned from its festive snooze.
The SNP cannot win a general election UK-wide, so the assessment to voters is not strictly a slap in its own face.
But bigging up an opponent and very much placing them as a government in waiting, is surely a very risky move.
Let’s be honest – barring a catastrophe – Labour will form the next UK Government later this year.
Keir Starmer’s party is soaring in the polls. It appears clear that voters have had it up to here with the Conservatives and are looking for a change.
We are some way out from the election, probably, so a lot can happen between now and polling day. A huge backing of support from the public can vanish at the drop of a hat – just ask the SNP still reeling from Nicola Sturgeon’s resignation and all that followed.
But it is a pretty safe bet to say that Labour is a shoo-in to form the next UK Government.
You can see where the SNP pitch to voters is coming from, but it is pretty wild.
The idea is that Labour are so far ahead in the polls that the fight for Scottish seats will become insignificant to them.
Read more:
Unspun | 'Following the science': How Scottish Government kept up appearances during Covid
The First Minister knows that people do not see Labour and Tories as the same thing – his former Westminster leader Ian Blackford has called for the ‘red Tories’ jibe to be banished.
Unfortunately for the SNP, independence is, at least for the time being, not the big question in Scottish politics.
The route to independence has reached a dead end with no obvious solution and there are more pressing matters such as the cost-of-living crisis that voters care about.
Under Anas Sarwar, Scottish Labour has been very cautious on the constitution, perhaps too much. The party has done away, mostly, with the muscular unionism that was doing it no favours with the public.
To many sensible left-wing voters who are curious about independence, Labour are now seen as an alternative to the Conservatives, not part of the same big unionist machine anymore.
Labour’s main appeal to Scottish voters at the general election will be removing the Conservatives from Downing Street – something the SNP cannot do and only Sir Keir’s party can.
There will be a wee bit of panic within the SNP that those who support independence and would maybe back Mr Yousaf’s party at the ballot box will happily vote Labour if it means removing Rishi Sunak from office.
The strategy is trying to play into a narrative that only the SNP has Scotland’s interests at heart and that Labour will have too many important things to deal with in running the UK to concern itself with Scotland.
Again this is a risky message to send out, particularly when the Scottish Government is suffering from voter fatigue after 17 years in office.
Get Scotland's top politics newsletter sent directly to your inbox each evening.
The last time Labour swept to power at Westminster, the 1997 landslide victory saw Tony Blair pick up 56 Scottish seats and begin the process of Scottish devolution.
Voters had many reasons to vote either Yes or No in the 2014 referendum, but many supported and still backed independence because of the positive outlook put forward by the Yes campaign.
This positive message will need to be put forward by the SNP if it is to hang onto as many seats as possible at Westminster, while Labour will also need to draw up a positive vision for what it will do in government and not continue to ride the coattails of a desperately unpopular Conservative government.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel