UK Defence Secretary Grant Shapps has been unable to confirm when a Conservative pledge to raise defence spending would be reached, despite having warned of rising global threats.
Mr Shapps said spending on defence was currently below the target of 2.5% of gross domestic product (GDP), a measure of the size of the economy.
“We’re comfortably above 2%,” he told Sky’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips.
“But we are pledged to, when conditions allow, get to 2.5%.”
Challenged over when that goal would be hit, he told the BBC’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: “There is a trajectory upwards.
“I can’t give you the exact date because we’ve always said it’s as the economic conditions allow.
Read more: Humza Yousaf: Muslims fear 'Palestinian blood is very cheap'
“But the point is we’re working to a plan.”
He defended Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s focus on tax cuts rather than upping defence spending, arguing “people do want to see more of the money that they earn kept”.
It came after Mr Shapps earlier this week made the case for increased western defence spending, saying the UK was facing a “pre-war world”.
In a major speech on Monday, the Defence Secretary set out the risks posed by countries including China, Russia, Iran and North Korea as well as terrorist groups in an increasingly dangerous world.
Before taking on the defence brief, Mr Shapps had backed a level of spending in excess of the UK Government’s goal, arguing it should rise to 3%.
He said in his Lancaster House address that the UK has increased its funding, with a record £50 billion a year being spent on defence.
Read more: Shapps makes case for increased western defence spending in ‘pre-war’ era
But the speech was seen viewed as a push for extra funding, both at home and by Nato allies, many of whom are not meeting the alliance’s 2% of GDP spending target.
Also this week, counter-terrorism police said Britain faced its most “acute threat” of hostile foreign interference and spying since the Cold War because of the “triple threat” of Russia, China and Iran.
Read more: MPs urge UK Government to reassess Scottish defence needs
And a former chief of the general staff of the British Army warned the UK risked a repeat of the 1930s unless more was invested in its armed forces.
General Lord Dannatt hit out at the shrinking size of the army, which he said had fallen from 102,000 in 2006 to 74,000 today “and falling fast”.
He drew parallels with the 1930s when the “woeful” state of the UK’s armed forces failed to deter Hitler, saying there was “a serious danger of history repeating itself”.
But Mr Shapps insisted the size of the army would not dip below 73,000 under the Tories.
He said: “It’s not projected to go down to 50,000.
“It’s actually, specifically, to 73,000 plus the reserves.”
The senior Tory minister went on to play down concerns about the capabilities of the British military.
Labour’s shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper would not commit to Labour spending 3% of GDP a year on defence if elected.
Speaking on Sky News, she said: “Decisions for future spending if Labour wins the election would be for a Labour chancellor… “But we have been clear about the importance of our national security.
“National security is the bedrock on which everything else in the country and everybody’s wellbeing is built and so of course that includes supporting our Armed Forces and making sure that they have the investment and the support that they need.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel