Owners of inherited croft houses should be banned from running the property as a holiday let when housing shortages are acute, a Stornoway-born MSP has suggested.
Rhoda Grant, Labour MSP for the Highlands and Islands, said any properties that were built with "public money" should only be used as a permanent residence.
She said this should also include ex-council houses and said the measure could help address housing shortages in the highlands and islands that are hampering population growth.
The results of Scotland's first Census show areas of the Highlands including Sutherland and Kinlochleven in Lochaber experienced significant population decline between 2003 to 2020.
The population in the Western Isles is predicted to fall to 24,784 by 2028 from the 2022 figure of 26,200. Housing is repeatedly held up as a barrier to growth.
"We need is a balance of second homes and holiday homes and full-time lived in homes," said the MSP.
"We live in a beautiful part of the world and I'm not saying we shouldn't have any short-term lets - they provide income to people.
"Any property that had any public money involved in its creation should never be a second home or holiday home.
"I'm talking about council houses, housing association houses and croft houses which are owner-occupied but built with government grants.
"They should be kept for the public. I'm not saying that people can't sell their croft but it was built with public money for the public good.
"All of those should be retained for day-to-day use and that would be quite easy to do."
She said crofters and landowners were sometimes willing to make land available for housing but this was usually at "exorbitant prices."
The Scottish Government has introduced a series of measures to try to curb second home ownership including doubling council tax but the MSP said this was "not an inhibitor."
READ MORE:
- Tourism push in 'forgotten' Highland village 'aggressive and unfair'
- Kate Forbes: 'My dream of independence call halt Highland population decline'
- 'It was unacceptable to lose our Highland school - so we built our own'
"If you got a second home you can afford to pay more council tax," she said. "It's helpful to councils but that's not an inhibitor.
"The licensing scheme caught out people who rent out a room in their house for three months of the year as a B&B. If you are running a business you can afford to do those things.
"It could have been good but the folk who drafted it didn't have a clue about the reality on the ground so they have prevented a lot of people renting out their rooms.
""Scotland-wide legislation doesn't really work. You have to structure it for the local community."
She said persuading more young people to stay in the Highlands, in particular, was reliant on enhanced public investment.
She said: "There are no jobs, housing is not affordable, schools are closing and health services are being centralised to Inverness.
"You can see the issues in Caithness where people are travelling 200 miles to give birth.
"Everyone talks about the A9 and dualling but north of Inverness, it just gets worse the further north you go and is often blocked by snow and often blocked by cars.
"It's not a good road. We haven't had investment in things like public services for a long time."
Minister for Housing Paul McLennan said: “There are already controls on the use of housing built with public subsidy.
"All homes funded through the Affordable Housing Supply Programme should be used for the purpose intended.
"For social rented and mid-market homes, restrictions regarding the use and occupation of the property will be set out by the landlord as part of the tenancy agreement.
"For shared equity homes, the agreement states the property must be the sole residence of the purchaser and any letting is not permitted.
“With regard to croft houses, the eligibility requirements for the Croft House Grant scheme state the proposed new build or house improvement must be used for domestic purposes only, no part of the house can be used for non-residential purposes such as a B&B or holiday home and the house must be the principal residential home of the crofter.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel