The Scottish Government's flagship £500m plan to improve public transport and increase passenger numbers as it seeks to ban older cars from city centres has been plunged into 'chaos' with just £26.9m spent, it has emerged.
It has been confirmed by the Scottish Government that there are "no plans" to provide direct funding for the Bus Partnership Fund in the next financial year.
The Herald can further reveal that since the fund was established the number of passenger journeys on local bus services in Scotland has actually fallen by nearly 25%.
It is further revealed that the Scottish Government budget for supporting bus services has been slashed by nearly half over two years, from £99.41m in 2022/23 to £55.5m in 2024/25. In the past year there has been an 11% cut.
The bus service support budget provides funding for the Network Support Grant, which helps bus operators to keep fares down and enable them to run services that might not otherwise be commercially viable.
READ MORE: Council accused of profiteering as Glasgow LEZ fines double
Campaigners fear that the cuts are likely to impact on the government's aim to cut car miles in Scotland and help protect the environment while low emission zones are being established across the country banning older cars.
Five years ago the Scottish Government's Transport Scotland agency said the "transformational" £500m fund aimed to deliver bus priority measures across Scotland and address a decline in passengers.
It said the fund was also expected to leverage other bus service improvements to help tackle the climate emergency and cut car use.
But the Herald can further reveal that since then, rather than there being a recovery in passenger journeys on local bus services in Scotland - it has actually fallen.
The latest Department for Transport tracker shows that in pre-pandemic 2019 there were 386m journeys but in 2022/23 that has fallen to 301m. Throughout the 1990s, there were typically 500m journeys made annually by bus.
And the number of public service buses run by local operators in Scotland has slumped by over 20% from 4,100 in 2019 to 3,200 in 2023. Sixteen years ago there were 5,400 in operation.
According to Transport Scotland's website, the fund is "currently closed for applications".
The Confederation of Passenger Transport Scotland has raised its concerns about the spend with Scottish ministers and is seeking talks to seek assurances over the fund commitment.
They query why the fund is being referred to as part of a long term package of support and what it means to work in progress.
CPT Scotland said: "Our members fear that even a temporary ‘pause’ in this work could prove disastrous for the future of bus priority and is likely to majorly impact on the Government’s stated aim to reduce car kms."
Sustainable transport charity Transform Scotland said that it was "deeply concerned" about the future prospects for Scotland's buses.
Colin Howden, the charity's director said: "The Scottish Government’s decision to cancel its £500m commitment to bus priority undermines efforts to improve bus service reliability and speed, which are the top barriers to bus use.
“Buses are most heavily used by lower income households, so moving forward quickly with bus priority would have the greatest benefits for those people most affected by the cost-of-living crisis.
READ MORE: Lost Glasgow LEZ court case costs campaigners £130,000
"The Government’s announcement in 2019 of a £500 million investment in bus priority was rightly welcomed as a transformational commitment to Scotland’s main form of public transport. But it’s over four years since the Scottish Government announced the Bus Partnership Fund and we’re yet to see a single metre of new bus lane on the ground.
“The slow speed and unreliability of bus services is one of the principal barriers that deters people from taking the bus. Putting in place new bus priority would reduce congestion and improve journey times, meaning time and money savings for both passengers and operators. But just 6% of the funds have so far been spent. This lack of progress will likely have further exacerbated fare increases and service cuts."
Another campaigner for green transport said that the measures to improve public transport should have been prioritised in advance of the introduction of low emission zones across Scotland.
"The fact that spending from this fund has been stopped at a time when we are supposed to be encouraging use of public transport just places the shift to sustainable travel into chaos," she said. "LEZs are, of course, welcome but there has to be an easy and efficient way to travel outwith petrol and diesel cars so how can cutting resources into buses be a way forward."
The net zero, energy and transport secretary Michael Matheson has previously described the fund as a “landmark, long-term capital investment of over £500m for bus priority measures”.
Projects in Glasgow, Aberdeen and Edinburgh have received funding for preparatory work, including evidence for bus-only streets, bus lanes, and traffic lights. As of last year, it is understood major projects have yet to enter the consultation phase.
It emerged that since Glasgow's low emission zone was enforced in June, more than 25,000 fines have been issued.
Some £1.354m was expected to be brought in in the first four months of enforcement.
The amount brought in from fines has risen by over two-and-a-half times over the four months from £173,820 in June to £457,800 in September. In July, some £405,780 was raised and in August it was £422,280.
Enforcement is expected to be brought in in Edinburgh, Dundee, Aberdeen in June, this year.
The motoring organisation RAC has previously warned ministers that the LEZs will discriminate against lower income households who rely on older cars and cannot afford to change up.
Exemptions are available for blue badge holders, motorbikes, mopeds and emergency vehicles. But in general petrol cars made before 2005 and diesels built before September 2014 are not allowed in the zone.
Campaigners had raised concerns that the criteria of the bus partnership fund would prevent councils from setting up publicly-run bus companies, despite provision made for this in an associated Transport Bill. Instead, only organisations which have set-up bus service improvement partnerships (BSIPs) with commercial bus companies operating locally, were able to apply for the fund.
The Scottish Government has previously insisted that the decision to make the fund available only to BSIPs, which must include private bus companies as members, does not prevent them from running their own bus companies.
Mr Howden added: “Bus patronage has still to recover to pre-pandemic levels, and, as expected, this has led to cuts to bus services and frequencies, and increased fares. So the decision of the Scottish Government to cancel its main investment fund for bus services as part of its Scottish Budget for 2024/25 is particularly foolish.
“The success of bus priority measures is clear. Aberdeen’s introduction of bus gates has resulted in shorter journey times – with the savings for First and Stagecoach being reinvested to provide free travel for passengers in January.”
Mr Matheson, told a bus partnership conference in February 2021 that there was a commitment to the fund and that it sent a "clear signal that we were looking towards the future".
"Together with our unprecedented investment in active travel, this long-term funding commitment is aimed at encouraging a transition away from single occupancy car use to more sustainable travel, linking bus and other public transport modes to walking, cycling and wheeling."
He said there was an ambitious commitment to achieve a 20% reduction in car kilometres by 2030.
"To affect that that will require us to take forward a range of actions. One thing is clear though - we need a positive alternative and the delivery of bus partnership and the Bus Partnership Fund is absolutely crucial to that," he said.
Transport Scotland said the pausing of the fund was down to "budgetary constraints".
A spokesman said: "Our firm commitment to bus continues with almost £430 million in funding for concessionary travel and bus services planned for 2024/25.
“This will see investment of over £370 million to support concessionary bus travel, providing access to free bus travel for over 2 million people, funding of almost £50 million to help ensure our bus operators can continue to provide access to affordable transport, and around £6 million to continue our support for the Community Bus Fund.
“Given the budgetary constraints faced the Bus Partnership Fund will be paused for next year. Fund spend will proceed as planned for 2023-24 to complete the delivery of the bus infrastructure underway for the benefit of passengers and operators, and conclude appraisal work underway that could inform future investment. This pausing presents an opportunity to recast bus priority projects within the wider work to be undertaken to deliver on our vision for the Future of Public Transport.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel