Scottish Green Party leader Patrick Harvie has said the UK military strikes on targets in Yemen are “grave and deeply troubling”, and called on Rishi Sunak to recall parliament to allow MPs to discuss the crisis.
Speaking after UK and US forces bombed military facilities used by Houthi rebels in Yemen, Scottish Government Zero Carbon Buildings Minister Mr Harvie said Rishi Sunak “must explain his actions”.
Rishi Sunak has faced calls for greater consultation in Parliament on the military action amid growing concern over escalation in the Middle East, with pressure increasing after the UK Government signaled its intention to intervene in the Red Sea on Thursday.
The Prime Minister said this morning Britain has taken “limited, necessary and proportionate action in self-defence” after the Iranian-backed group attacked ships in the Red Sea.
Last night, Humza Yousaf took to X, formerly Twitter, on Thursday evening, calling for Westminster to be recalled.
He said the UK did “not have a good record” of military intervention in the Middle East.
Scotland’s First Minister said: “It is therefore incumbent that Westminster is recalled, MPs briefed and allowed to debate and scrutinise any decision to pursue military action that the UK Government is proposing.”
Speaking this morning, his Scottish Government cabinet colleague Mr Harvie said: “The people of the UK will not stand another government taking it to war in the Middle East, or acting without even observing a basic democratic process.
READ MORE: Which UK ships have been deployed to Red Sea?
“The UK Government should not have acted without consulting Parliament and should recall MPs to address the actions that risk destabilising the region further. The public should not have to wait a weekend for answers.
“We should all be deeply troubled by the UK’s history of military interventions in the region, often making matters worse and learn lessons of the past.”
He added: “The situation in the Red Sea is of course alarming, but this will increase tensions or widen conflicts further. The critical condition for de-escalating the conflict is an immediate ceasefire and an end to the killing in Gaza.”
The strikes on Thursday night were the first to be launched against the Houthi militants since they started targeting international shipping in the key international trade route.
The Ministry of Defence said four Royal Air Force jets struck two Houthi facilities involved in their targeting of HMS Diamond and US Navy vessels on Tuesday.
One was a site at Bani and the other the Abbs airfield, used to launch drones and cruise missiles.
The US Air Force said it struck more than 60 targets at 16 sites in Yemen.
The UK and US had non-operational support from Australia, Bahrain, Canada and the Netherlands.
On Friday, Armed Forces Minister James Heappey played down concerns about the danger of escalation after criticism from Russia, which requested an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council on the strikes.
READ MORE: RAF launches ‘targeted strikes’ against Houthi rebel sites
There are fears over a dramatic regional widening of the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza and rising tensions with Iran, which backs the Houthis and has condemned the air strikes.
Saudi Arabia has expressed “great concern” over the situation and has called for “restraint and avoiding escalation”.
The UK and US have carried out targeted strikes on Houthi military targets in Yemen.
— David Cameron (@David_Cameron) January 12, 2024
The safety of UK vessels and the freedom of navigation across the Red Sea is paramount and that is why we are taking action.
As the UNSC has made clear, the Houthis must halt attacks in…
Mr Heappey told BBC Breakfast: “Clearly there is nervousness amongst those partners in the region that there could be some sort of escalation, but we were confident that these limited, proportionate, necessary strikes that went in last night were what was necessary to disrupt the Houthis’ ability to attack our warships that are protecting shipping in the southern Red Sea.
“And clearly nobody should see this as part of anything bigger.”
The minister also said the Government’s “legal position is sound” and that no more UK strikes are planned for the moment.
Mr Sunak, early on Friday morning, said it “cannot stand” that the Houthis continued to carry out “dangerous” attacks against commercial vessels in the Red Sea despite repeated warnings from the international community.
“The United Kingdom will always stand up for freedom of navigation and the free flow of trade.”
The Prime Minister, who is making a surprise visit to Ukraine on Friday, held a full Cabinet call the previous evening in which ministers discussed the response to disruption on the key global shipping route.
In an unusual move, the Government briefed Sir Keir Starmer and shadow defence secretary John Healey after the call.
The UK does not have a good record of military intervention in the Middle East. It is therefore incumbent that Westminster is recalled, MPs briefed and allowed to debate and scrutinise any decision to pursue military action that the UK Government is proposing. https://t.co/JNJBbNsQji
— Humza Yousaf (@HumzaYousaf) January 11, 2024
Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn described the strikes as “a reckless act of escalation” and said it “is utterly disgraceful that Parliament has not even been consulted”.
The Houthis have claimed their attacks have been on Israel-linked shipping in the Red Sea in response to the country’s bombardment of Gaza since Hamas’ assault on Israel on October 7.
The Ministry of Defence said early indications are the strikes dealt a “blow” to the Houthis’ ability to threaten merchant shipping in the Red Sea, through which some 15% of the world’s shipping passes.
But the militants said the strikes would not prevent them from continuing their attacks.
A high-ranking Houthi official, Ali al-Qahoum, posted on X: “The battle will be bigger… and beyond the imagination and expectation of the Americans and the British.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel