Scottish taxpayers have been charged £17million for work on flagship SNP care reforms which have been delayed three years because of flawed financial planning.
The controversial National Care Service (NCS) was last month punted into the next parliament because of a raft of problems and U-turns, meaning it may never happen.
But in a parliamentary answer, SNP social care minister Maree Todd revealed around 160 civil servants were still working on it at an average monthly cost of £814,000.
She said the cost of preparatory work on the NCS was estimated at £9.77million in 2023/24 and the cumulative spend on civil servants since 2021/22 was £17.4m.
The Tories said the costs were “astonishing” and urged ministers to ditch the NCS plan.
READ MORE: Call to sack Matheson as A&E waiting time performance slumps
When Nicola Sturgeon launched the project in 2021, the then First Minister said it was “arguably the most significant public service reform” since the creation of the NHS in 1948.
The aim was to end the “postcode lottery” in community health and social care, by ensuring consistent and high standards and “embedding the principles of fair work for care workers”.
The “go live” date was due to be 2025/26, within the current parliament.
However in December that was pushed back to 2028/29, well into the parliament that runs from 2026 to 2031, when the SNP might not be in power, and the NCS could be abandoned.
Scottish Tory chair Craig Hoy MSP said the spending to date had been “eye-watering”.
He said: “This is typical of how the SNP recklessly squander taxpayers’ money.
“It is astonishing that 160 civil servants are still working directly on these plans - at a cost of over £800,000 per month - when they have been roundly opposed by stakeholders.
“Maree Todd needs to accept reality and ditch her party’s illogical plans for centralised social care in Scotland, rather than throwing good money after bad.
“The scarcely believable £10m costs for civil servants earmarked for this year should be urgently diverted towards local care services which are buckling on the SNP’s watch.
“Patients suffering delayed discharge or insufficient care – along with dedicated frontline staff – need those vital resources, but they are seeing them being frittered away by an arrogant SNP Government who typically think they know best.”
The original plan involved transferring council-run care services and assets to the NCS, with existing joint NHS and council integration authorities replaced by local care boards.
READ MORE: SNP urged to reverse 'brutal' cut to affordable housing budget
As care and social work makes up around a third of council budgets, local authorities and unions pushed back hard against the prospect of large-scale transfers and job uncertainty.
The plan was also criticised by MSPs for relying on a so-called "framework Bill" to create the service, with much of the critical detail filled in later by secondary legislation.
The Scottish Government said regulations would be created using a process of “co-design” by various interested parties, including patients, trade unions and the social care sector.
Ministers now say councils will retain responsibility for “all their current functions and the delivery of social work and social care services”, meaning no transfer of staff or assets.
The creation of new care boards has also been axed in favour of reforming integration authorities, with a National Care Service Board monitoring the sector and giving advice.
Forecast to cost between £644m and £1.26bn, the price tag for the NCS in its original form has risen to between £880m and £2.2bn.
MSPs will therefore be asked to amend the Bill behind it to incorporate the proposed changes, cutting the cost over the first 10 years to between £631m and £916m.
All told, it amounts to a major retreat from the original proposals.
The Scottish Government has been asked for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel