Nearly two million bank and agency NHS shifts were advertised in 2022-23 – an “eye-watering” increase of 110%, in five years, according to the Scottish Tories.
Statistics obtained by the party through freedom of information requests show the number of these shifts across Scottish health boards doubled since 2018-19.
In 2018-19, 104,794 agency and 841,629 bank shifts were advertised across the NHS.
But in the most recent year, the figures soared to 464,495 and 1,520,227 respectively – 1,984,722 in total.
And in the period between April and May 2023, there had been a combined 403,733 bank and agency shifts advertised.
Scottish Tory health spokesman and GP, Dr Sandesh Gulhane, said the reliance on external staff was “deeply alarming”.
However, the proportion of these shifts being filled has fallen by 17.9% in the five-year period. In 2018-19, 71.9% were taken up, declining to 54% in 2022-23.
READ MORE: Ayrshire nurse works 'shocking' 18 hour shift
Glasgow MSP Dr Gulhane said: “The rise in the use of bank and agency staff on the SNP’s watch is absolutely eye-watering.
“While I know first-hand the important role bank and agency staff play in supporting our NHS, it is clear that the SNP’s dire workforce planning and mismanagement of our health service has left boards increasingly reliant on them.
“The fact that nearly two million bank and agency shifts were advertised last year alone is deeply alarming and a shameful reflection on the SNP’s record in charge on Scotland’s NHS.
“NHS resources are already at breaking point so the last thing health boards need to be doing is shelling out money on this scale to external staff to ensure shifts are fully covered.
“While SNP Health Secretary Michael Matheson is discredited and distracted by the multiple personal scandals surrounding him, he cannot let this situation continue. He must outline a proper workforce plan to reduce the dependence on bank and agency staff.”
Health Secretary Michael Matheson said: “Agency nursing is a tiny fraction of the £10 billion a year NHS Scotland staffing pay bill and the majority of temporary staff come from staff banks – meaning these are NHS staff, working on NHS terms and conditions.
“New controls were introduced by boards from April 1 to begin to reduce the number of shifts being filled by agency staff and from June 1 boards are no longer using off-framework agencies, unless in exceptional circumstances.
“Boards have reported significant progress in reducing reliance on agency staff as a result of these changes and we are considering what further steps we can take.
“Since October 2021 more than £18 million has been provided to recruit 1,250 international nurses, midwives and Allied Health Professionals by the end of this financial year, with around 1,000 successfully recruited so far.
“We absolutely value our nursing staff and have reached historically high NHS staffing as well as investing £1 billion over two years on NHS Agenda for Change Pay which includes a 6.5% pay raise for 2023-24.”
READ MORE: Job advert ‘error’ left NHS Highland backpedalling
Dr Iain Kennedy, Chair BMA Scotland, said: “Scotland is in the grips of a doctor recruitment and retention crisis – and these figures demonstrate the impact that is having.
“Agency shifts are expensive and not a sustainable way to staff our NHS, and it is worrying the health service in Scotland is becoming more and more reliant on them. Just days after our snap survey revealed 80% of doctors who responded feel staffing levels are sometimes or regularly unsafe, this shows yet again how urgent a proper long term workforce plan for Scotland’s NHS is.
“We also need to finally properly value doctors at all stages of their career. And by investing in permanent staff, rather than temporarily plugging the gaps, the NHS could provide the continuity of care to patients that the evidence shows leads to better health outcomes.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel