Grieving families have waiting for more than eight years for a fatal accident inquiry (FAI) into the death of their loved ones, official figures have revealed.
The most recent statistics, highlighted by the Scottish Lib Dems, showed that from the date of a death until October 31 2023, a total of 3,037 days – or eight years and three months – had passed while the inquiry remained in limbo.
Meanwhile, an FAI that concluded in 2021-22 took nine years and four months – 3,440 days – to finish.
READ MORE: Scottish Budget: Cosla: Plans fail to tackle 'root causes' of poverty
The Scottish Liberal Democrats have called for Scottish ministers to reform the system, saying it is “unfit for purpose”.
The party’s plans would see Scotland adopt a process similar to the coroner system in England, by removing the remit from the Crown and Procurator Fiscal Service (CPFS) and setting a one-year timeline for an inquiry to commence.
Figures provided to the party by the CPFS also showed the average FAI completed in 2022-23 took 1,163 days – more than three years.
The average outstanding FAI has been more than two years – 774 days – while the average wait for a death in custody is 650 days.
FAIs into the deaths of Katie Allan and William Lindsay, who killed themselves within months of each other in Polmont Young Offenders Institute, are among those outstanding since 2018-19.
The Scottish Government said the laws were modernised in 2016, with no plans to revisit the legislation.
Liam McArthur, justice spokesman for the Scottish Lib Dems, said: “The fatal accident inquiry system should be about providing answers and learning lessons for the future, but a system that takes almost a decade to reach conclusions is deeply flawed and unfit for purpose.
“As time goes on and years pass, evidence is lost and memories fade, making it so much more difficult to provide families with much-needed answers about their loved ones.
“The SNP Government have had plenty of opportunities to reform fatal accident inquiries but they have chosen to cling to a failed system.
“It’s time for ministers to urgently undertake root-and-branch reform. Scottish Liberal Democrats would remove FAIs from the remit of the Crown Office and hand them to a new body charged with ensuring that inquiries begin within a year and that results are presented in a timely fashion, learning from the coroner system in England.”
The Lord Advocate is responsible for investigating sudden, unexpected and unexplained deaths in Scotland including deciding whether or not to hold an FAI. These functions are exercised independently of the Scottish Government.
A spokesperson for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service said: “COPFS takes very seriously its contribution to Scotland’s response to deaths investigations and accepts the need for improvement.
“Calls for change to the system of Fatal Accident Inquiries (FAI) are a matter for Government.
“COPFS has modernised its processes to reduce the time taken to investigate deaths, improve communication and to bring FAIs to court more quickly.
“The COPFS budget has been increased in recent years to help to support the progress of death investigations.”
A Government spokeswoman said: “The Lord Advocate is constitutionally responsible for the investigation of sudden, unexpected unexplained deaths in Scotland. These functions are exercised independently of the Scottish Government.
“The Crown Office has significantly reformed the arrangements for the investigation of deaths. These reforms have already resulted in reductions in the duration of death investigations and it is expected that they will continue to do so.
“Parliament considered and modernised the law on fatal accident inquiries in 2016 and there are currently no plans to revisit the legislation.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel