This article appears as part of the Unspun: Scottish Politics newsletter.
It seems there isn’t much that isn’t woke these days. In the ongoing culture war all of the following have all been labelled as such: capitalism, Covid, the legal system, James Bond, the police and artificial intelligence.
That list is anything but exhaustive, and to it we can now officially add archaeology.
During equalities questions in the House of Commons, Conservative MP Philip Hollobone cited a study authored by a professor at the Musuem of London, describing it as “sensationalist research findings and woke archaeology”.
The equalities minister, Kemi Badenoch, agreed and stated that she’d written to the museum to express her concerns.
Aside from it being objectively funny that a man called Hollobone is complaining about archaeology, what is the ‘woke’ study in question? Unsurprisingly, it’s about race and inequality.
Published in the journal Bioarchaeology International and titled Race, Population Affinity, and Mortality Risk during the Second Plague Pandemic in Fourteenth-Century London, England, the paper looks at the possibility that people of certain ethnicities may have been more at risk of dying from the bubonic plague than others.
Researchers examined the remains of 145 people – 49 buried in plague cemeteries and 96 buried in non-plague cemeteries – which is acknowledged as a small sample size – and analysed five features of their skulls to estimate their likely heritage.
The study found that those of likely African heritage were disproportionately more likely to have died of the plague than those of Asian or European heritage, which could possibly have been down to existing inequalities in addition to free or forced migration outcomes.
Read more:
Unspun | Farage, Rwanda and the looming general election
This might all seem fairly innocuous, but not if you’re a frontline soldier in the culture wars. Ms Badenoch said in the Commons that the study was “based on phrenology” – which it wasn’t – and that the idea of structural racism being a factor in health outcomes could lower trust in the health system among ethnic minorities.
The obvious rejoinder to this would be that trust in the health system is lower among ethnic minorities because of structural racism. A 2016 study on US medical students found they wrongly assumed black people needed less pain medication than their white counterparts, based on misconceptions such as black people having thicker skin or fewer nerve endings. Almost two thirds (65%) of black people who responded to a 2022 British Medical Journey survey said that they had experienced prejudice from doctors and other staff in healthcare settings.
That though, is to treat ‘woke archaeology’ with more seriousness than it deserves. For a certain section of the population ‘woke’ just means ‘things I don’t like’. You know, “my woke ex-wife won’t let me see the kids after the woke divorce because I stopped paying woke child support”.
The phrase originally meant being alert (or awake) to racial prejudice and discrimination but has been co-opted by the Jordan Peterson and Neil Oliver set who view it as part of a secret Marxist plot to bring down western civilisation.
That’s not a joke. The idea goes back to the Italian Marxist philosopher Antonio Gramsci, who in his writings sought to understand why revolution had not spread outside of the USSR.
He concluded that as well as a direct physical hegemony (the kind involving guns and the army) of the ruling class, there existed also a cultural hegemony represented by institutions such as the church, universities, newspapers and more.
Rather than shy away from, for example, academia, he reasoned, those of a Marxist persuasion should try to enter into those spaces and present their own counter-hegemonic ideas. These ideas would be studied by academics from the so-called Frankfurt School, a group of largely Jewish intellectuals who fled Nazi Germany after being accused of propagating ‘cultural Bolshevism’.
Sign up for Unspun, Scotland's top politics newsletter.
After settling in the US they continued to look at how things such as race, class, gender, culture and more intertwine to create society as we see it today – or, if you prefer, set about undermining the fabric of western society to bring about a communist future.
As a result we have a Tory government on its way out, clinging to poorly-defined culture wars as its only bulwark against electoral oblivion, suggesting without a hint of irony that there’s such a thing as ‘woke archaeology’.
What will be the next battleground in the war on woke? Woke orienteering? Woke carpentry? Woke cutlery that blocks the drawer from opening? It’s enough to put you to sleep.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel