Chancellor Jeremy Hunt made much of his tax-cutting credentials in the Autumn Statement.
The main rate of national insurance contributions (NICs) was cut for both employees (from 12% to 10%) and the self-employed (from 9% to 8%), in addition to abolishing Class 2 NICs.
But looking at the tax to GDP ratio tells a different story. The tax burden - the percentage of the nation’s income going to the government - is still on track to rise to a post-war high.
The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecasts that the tax-to-GDP ratio will be at 37.7% at the forecast horizon in 2028/29.
Read more: Hunt confirms benefits rise but new penalties cause alarm
The tax burden is now expected to be 4.5 percentage points higher in 2028/29 than it was pre-pandemic, and 0.4 percentage points higher than the OBR projected in March.
One big reason is the freezing of most income tax thresholds so they don’t rise with inflation.
This is fiscal drag – where people are “dragged” into higher tax brackets than they otherwise would have been.
This increase in the tax burden comes alongside a pretty dismal set of economic forecasts.
The recovery from the pandemic might have been stronger than previously thought, but the OBR now forecasts growth to be lower in every year until 2026, and inflation to stay higher for longer.
Slowing growth and persistent inflation, together with the high tax burden, mean living standards are expected by the OBR to remain below pre-pandemic levels until 2027/28.
This would be almost a full decade of stagnation.
The Chancellor has announced the permanent extension of his ‘full expensing’ (FE) policy, temporarily introduced for three years in March 2023.
Read more: Autumn Statement and Prime Minister's Questions: Oh, what japes
This allows companies (not including unincorporated businesses such as self-employed, sole traders and partnerships) to immediately write off the full cost of investment in new plant and machinery against taxable profit in the year the investment cost incurred.
While the move to a permanent measure is expected to increase business investment in the medium to long run, there is no guarantee of the quality or productivity of these investments, which is required to boost output and economic growth.
The two main tax measures - lower NICs and making full expensing permanent - are UK-wide, and apply automatically in Scotland.
Some other measures announced are England-only, and therefore bring with them additional funding for the Scottish Government through the Barnett formula, totalling £233m in this financial year and £281m in the next.
The main measures generating consequentials are:
- The funding of the pay award for the NHS in England in 2023/24, which generates £235m;
- The 75% relief on business rates in England for the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors in 2024/25, up to a £110,000 cash cap, which generates £232m;
- Freezing the small business multiplier in England in 2024/25, which generates £32m.
As these are devolved matters, the Scottish Government receives this funding but is under no obligation to match the policies announced by Westminster.
So this is one to watch out for at next month’s Scottish Budget.
Settlements with the Treasury are only fully determined until 2024/25.
Nevertheless, the UK Government budgets on a five-year basis, and has to give the OBR an indicative assumption for departmental and devolved spending.
This is only indicative at this time, but if the OBR’s forecast comes to pass, it would mean Scottish Government spending power being higher in each year by between £1.1bn and £1.4bn from 2025/26 onwards.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel