The Scottish Government will propose a full ban on all snares with no exceptions, it has been confirmed today.
In a move which has been praised by animal rights organisations and condemned by rural groups, environment minister Gillian Martin said she had considered the use of "humane cable restraints" and is arguing for a full ban in the Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Bill.
In a letter to the rural affairs committee, she said: "This decision has not been taken lightly, however the evidence I have seen demonstrates that the use of any kind of snare has unacceptable risks to animal welfare of both target and non-target species and that there are more humane alternative methods available.”
Read more: Now is the time to ban snares in Scotland
The decision has been welcomed by The League Against Cruel Sports, which described the traps as "needless cruelty".
The charity's Scotland director Robbie Marsland said: “What a fantastic outcome. The League has been calling for a ban on snares for decades, and in that time we have presented... countless examples of evidence illustrating the needless cruelty of these traps.
“Over the years our field workers have had to document and photograph an appalling array of mutilated foxes, exhausted badgers and even snared cats and dogs in order to demonstrate why these devices should be consigned to history.
"We are delighted that common sense has finally prevailed and the Minister is proposing to consign the use of these traps to history.”
'Threatened species will suffer'
But countryside groups have described the proposal as a "dark day for biodiversity, wildlife and rural livelihoods".
Rural business organisation Scottish Land & Estates (SLE) argues the devices are necessary to control fox populations to protect livestock and other wildlife such as ground nesting birds.
The group says the ban will make it much more difficult for gamekeepers, farmers and land managers to control fox populations and the predation they carry out on other species.
Ross Ewing, SLE director of moorland, said: "Today is a dark day for biodiversity, wildlife and rural livelihoods.
“Anger and disappointment will reverberate through Scotland’s land management community on the back of this decision.
"In less than a year, the Scottish Government has taken steps to systematically decimate the toolkit for fox control – first by curtailing the ability to use dogs to flush foxes; and now bringing forward an outright ban on the use of snares and HCRs.
“To do so at a time where biodiversity is hanging in the balance is unconscionable, and it is Scotland’s most threatened, iconic species that will suffer as a result."
Mr Ewing said red foxes pose an existential threat to species including the lapwing, capercaillie, curlew, merlin, and hen harriers.
'Concerns dismissed'
The Scottish Conservatives have said the proposals show how "out-of-touch" the SNP-Green government are with the interests of rural Scotland.
Shadow rural affairs secretary Rachael Hamilton MSP said: “The SNP minister responsible – Gillian Martin – has some serious questions to answer. A series of organisations gave evidence in good faith to the Parliament’s rural affairs committee believing she was willing to hear both sides of the argument.
"Less than 24 hours later, she’s dismissed those concerns and is aiming to railroad through a full ban on snares anyway.
“These devices are vital for those living and working in rural Scotland to protect their livestock and species that are under threat, yet it is clear the SNP minister had already made her mind up before coming to the committee.
“Clearly, the minister has made no attempt to engage with land managers to understand how a proposed licensing scheme for humane cable restraints would address welfare concerns, and at the same time promote biodiversity."
The Stage 1 debate of the Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Bill will take place on November 29.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel