Sir Keir Starmer has come under fresh pressure over his stance on the conflict in Gaza after a shadow minister became the first frontbencher to quit in protest at his leader's refusal to back a ceasefire.
Imran Hussain, MP for Bradford East, said he was quitting his role as shadow minister for the new deal for working people to be able to "strongly advocate" for a ceasefire.
The Labour leader has been grappling to maintain discipline in his top team on the Gaza conflict.
At least 16 shadow ministers have either called for a ceasefire or shared others' calls on social media while around 30 councillors have resigned.
READ MORE: Poll shows Labour discontent with Starmer over Israel-Gaza stance
Starmer's stance has also put him at odds with Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar who backs a ceasefire.
Shadow education secretary Bridget Phillipson said that Mr Hussain had "reached his own decision" on the matter.
Labour MP for Bradford East Imran Hussain pictured speaking in the House of Commons. File Photo PA.
She maintained that the party leadership did not see a ceasefire as the right move amid the escalating conflict, which has seen over 10,000 Palestinians killed.
"The difficulty with calls for a ceasefire is that it risks freezing the conflict in time, and also allowing Hamas to regroup and perpetrate further atrocities which they said, given the chance, they would absolutely do time and again."
READ MORE: Poll: Labour increase lead over SNP in shock survey of Scottish voters
She told Times Radio: "I would urge colleagues to always carefully choose their words where it comes to fast-moving international events, and where it isn't always clear or apparent very quickly what is happening on the ground."
In his letter to Sir Keir, Mr Hussain said he was "deeply troubled" by the Labour leader's interview on LBC in which he appeared to suggest that the Israeli government had a right to withhold water and power from citizens in Gaza.
"It is with a heavy heart that I am writing to tender my resignation as shadow minister for the New Deal for Working People after eight years on the Labour Party frontbench," Mr Hussain said.
READ MORE: Who are the Scottish Labour MP hopefuls?
He said he had been "proud" to work alongside Sir Keir and his deputy, Angela Rayner, in developing a plan for employment rights but could not "in all good conscience" push for a cessation of hostilities while remaining on the frontbench.
Mr Hussain said: "It has become clear that my view on the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza differs substantially from the position you have adopted."
Sir Keir has insisted collective responsibility remains important but has so far declined to say whether frontbenchers would face being sacked for breaking ranks to urge an end to fighting.
READ MORE: Part Two: Who are the Scottish Labour MP hopefuls?
A Labour Party spokesman said: "Labour fully understands calls for a ceasefire. Everybody wants to see an end to the shocking images we are seeing in Gaza. We need to see all hostages released and aid getting to those most in need.
"But a ceasefire now will only freeze this conflict and would leave hostages in Gaza and Hamas with the infrastructure and capability to carry out the sort of attack we saw on October 7.
"International law must be followed at all times and innocent civilians must be protected. Labour is calling for humanitarian pauses in the fighting.
"This is the best and most realistic way to address the humanitarian emergency in Gaza and is a position shared by our major allies."
Mr Hussain has been on Labour's frontbench for almost eight years, serving under Jeremy Corbyn's leadership as shadow international development minister in 2016.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel