The Scottish Government is keen on pledges to tackle the climate crisis – but is struggling to deliver action.
The crisis facing the planet is almost unimaginable in scale – politicians have next to no time to overhaul how everything works – at huge cost.
The warnings over the climate crisis have been stark – no-one is under any illusion about what is required.
The Scottish Government has been a champion of prioritising the climate crisis, a huge ask of a devolved government with limited power and spending levers.
Read more: SNP MSP: Lorna Slater has 'no clue' over circular economy costs
MSPs have set the bar incredibly high and that should be applauded.
Scotland’s legal date by which its contribution to the climate crisis will be over, reaching net zero, is set at 2045 – five years ahead of the UK-wide target.
Holyrood also has a key interim target for 2030 that looks almost impossible to reach without dramatic intervention, and many of the key levers are out of the hands of SNP and Green ministers.
Scotland has pledged that by 2030, emissions levels of 1990 will be cut by a whopping 75%.
For context, between 1990 and 2020, Scotland’s emissions were cut by 50%.
This essentially means that the same level of progress achieved in 30 years will be needed again in this decade.
Read more: Government advisers criticise SNP delaying crunch climate change plan
Net Zero Secretary Mairi McAllan has confirmed initial reports by The Herald that she will delay her next climate change plan from being published – the key blueprint for how Scotland will reach net zero.
Worryingly, eight out of the last 12 annual emissions targets have not been met – it is fair to say things are not on track.
Now, Ms McAllan has insisted that Rishi Sunak’s rollback of UK-wide net zero policies in September means more time is required to make sure Scotland’s strategy is as best as it can be.
But the chief executive of statutory advisers, the Climate Change Committee (CCC), has raised questions over whether this is true.
Read more: SNP Government confirms controversial fishing ban plans to be dropped
Chris Stark, who formerly worked as the director of energy and climate change for the Scottish Government, appears to have been left pretty unimpressed by the decision to delay the document, given the CCC had held off its monitoring of progress in Scotland to include the report, which was promised by the end of November.
There is no questioning the intent of the Scottish Government to tackle the climate crisis and meet net zero. But delivering action on the climate is becoming a problem.
The climate change plan being delayed is not the only part of the puzzle that has gone missing.
On the same day as she confirmed that the plan is being pushed back, Ms McAllan also stated that the controversial plans for highly protected marine areas are being binned after an outcry from the fishing industry - a show that business concerns can trump the need to protect the environment in the political landscape.
Waste and renewable heat targets remain way off track and the less said about the deposit return scheme the better – meanwhile, there appears to be little confidence that private funds will arrive at the scale needed to clean up how we heat our homes.
When the Scottish Government's updated energy plan, including its official position on oil and gas developments, finally arrives next summer, it will be almost two years delayed.
Humongous actions are needed as soon as possible if Scotland’s climate ambitions are to get back on track.
When the next climate change plan does emerge, it will need to bluntly set out how warm words will be backed up with real progress.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel