At the inaugural Artificial Information safety summit hosted at Bletchley Park this week, global leaders were tasked with considering the risks posed by this rapidly advancing technology and how nation states can address challenges that cross national borders.
But with national elections happening in the UK, US, and Europe next year, the threat to democracy from the power of AI technology to accelerate the production and dissemination of mis and disinformation is real.
More than ever, we need trusted sources of information such as The Herald to counteract the onslaught of false information and enable us make sense of today's complex world.
Next year’s UK general election will see 650 constituencies elect an MP. Six hundred and fifty individual elections that could be influenced by AI-generated false information.
A free press, holding power to account and asking the awkward questions of powerful people is fundamental to our democracy. AI has the opportunity to enhance, or destroy, this mission.
As a regulatory framework is developed, it is critical that governments and regulators understand the importance of protecting our media sector from the harmful effects of this technology. AI cannot be allowed to use news publishers’ content in any way without their express consent.
This means developing robust tools enabling publishers to fully protect their stories – the fuel that powers their businesses and enables them to invest further in journalism – from being exploited by third parties.
Otherwise, the exploitation of UK content creators by powerful tech companies will accelerate dramatically, causing untold damage to our creative economy.
Legislation is making its way through Westminster to address the overweening dominance of the tech platforms. The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill will give a new regulator – the Digital Markets Unit – the legal powers it needs to reset the balance, unlocking the full potential of the UK digital marketplace – and massively benefitting consumers.
It is vital for the success of the new regime that nothing is done to weaken the Bill as it passes through Parliament. The judicial review appeals standard – which has been carefully calibrated to make the regime as effective as possible – must be maintained.
This week, the industry comes together for the annual Journalism Matters campaign to celebrate the vital importance of trusted news and information to our society. In an increasingly uncertain and unstable world, the need for trusted sources of information has never been greater. Whether local or national or international, news media plays a critical role in keeping communities informed and campaigning on issues that affect people’s day to day lives.
Readers are at the heart of The Herald, with journalists doing the detailed and diligent work to analyse every story to expose the truth and present the facts to our audiences.
To continue that work, it is imperative that the UK Government upholds its commitment to repealing Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 – a commitment made in the Conservative manifestos in 2017 and 2019. The NMA has welcomed provisions in the Media Bill – which we hope will be confirmed the King’s Speech next week – to repeal this pernicious piece of legislation. The Bill enjoys cross party support and should be progressed quickly.
Owen Meredith, of News Media Association, which organises Journalism Matters
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here