The skulls of four Taiwanese tribal warriors killed nearly 150 years ago have been repatriated by a Scottish university.
The University of Edinburgh presented the remains to dignitaries from the Mudan community – also known as the Botan tribe – in a formal handover ceremony at the capital’s St Cecilia’s Hall.
Mudan is a township in the south of Taiwan predominantly populated by the Paiwan people, the second-largest indigenous group in the country.
Representatives of the University of Edinburgh took part in a traditional Paiwan service with the mayor of the Mudan Township before the handover to honour the spirits of the deceased warriors.
The skulls are now destined to be temporarily displayed in the National Museum of Prehistory in Taiwan until a permanent resting place is confirmed following a consultation with the Mudan communities.
READ MORE: Glasgow museum one of first in UK to open permanent exhibition marking slavery links
The four tribal warriors were killed in 1874 during a battle with Japanese invaders to avenge the deaths of 54 sailors who were slain three years earlier by the Paiwanese.
The sailors were ambushed after becoming shipwrecked in Taiwanese territory in what is now referred to as the “Mudan Incident”.
It is understood the four Mudan warriors were unlikely to have been the perpetrators of the original incident.
The skulls were thought to have originally been taken as war trophies by Japanese soldiers and were carried to Japan by an un-named US Navy officer who accompanied them as a military adviser.
Over the next 30 years, the skulls were held by Stuart Eldrige, a US doctor and skull collector living in Yokohama, and John Anderson, the first curator of the Indian Museum at Calcutta.
The remains finally reached Edinburgh in 1907 after being handed over to the university’s principal, William Turner.
The University of Edinburgh holds one of the largest and most historically significant collections of ancestral remains.
The majority of its skulls were brought together by Turner and, like many UK universities with anatomical collections, they came from the British Empire’s colonies or through their global networks.
Human craniums were used in the study of anatomy and anthropology as well as the now discredited idea of phrenology.
Popular in the UK and other parts of Europe in the colonial era, phrenology formulated racist theories of inferiority based on the shape and dimensions of a skull.
READ MORE: Glasgow tailor creates 'wacky' costumes to celebrate local heritage
The university’s Anatomical Museum collections are now studied for research into the history of genetics, diets and the movement of people.
Professor Tom Gillingwater, chair of Anatomy at University of Edinburgh, said: “This repatriation is a culmination of international co-operation between the University and the Taiwanese community.
“We are committed to addressing our colonial legacy and this repatriation is the latest action we have taken in line with our longstanding policy of returning items to appropriate representatives of the cultures from which they were taken.”
The university has a long history of repatriating remains and items from its collection and works with communities around the world to engage with its collections.
The first repatriation took place more than 75 years ago and, in 2019, nine skulls were returned in after being taken from Sri Lanka during the British colonial period in the 1880s.
The university continues to examine ways to address its colonial legacy and the contemporary impact of its complex past.
Alongside repatriations, the institution is undertaking a range of activity to review its past associations with the transatlantic slave trade, colonialism and other aspects of race.
In April last year, Glasgow councillors agreed to the largest repatriation of museum items in Scotland.
The artefacts included looted bronzes from Benin, a stolen ceremonial sword from India and belongings lifted from massacred Lakota people in South Dakota, USA.
The decision was made by Glasgow councillors following requests from the descendants of the rightful owners, with a cross-party group recommending the items were returned.
Cllr David McDonald, ex-chairman of Glasgow Life, said the decision to repatriate the items represented "a significant moment for the city and the wider debate on the topic of repatriation and decolonisation.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here