Vulnerable adults and children were targeted with "distressing and traumatising" do not resuscitate orders at the beginning of the pandemic, the Scottish Covid inquiry has heard.
Sara Redmond, chief development officer for Alliance - an umbrella body for charities and other not-for-profit organisations which support health and social care services - said it had received "concerning reports" around the period of the first national lockdown that patients and carers were receiving unsolicited requests from GP surgeries to sign DNR forms.
Ms Redmond said their unease was shared by the charities Age Scotland and the National Autistic Society in Scotland.
She said that while people understood the need for anticipatory care planning, there was alarm over the sudden and improper use of DNRs.
Giving evidence on the fifth day of the inquiry in Edinburgh, Ms Redmond said: "There was one mum who shared an experience where she received this unsolicited request about her child.
"She was told that this form was going to be applied to her son and there would also be no hospital transport in the event that he needed support to save his life.
"It was delivered to her pretty much as a cold call - extremely distressing and traumatising for her - and has really left her really questioning the support that is available for her and her son now and in the future."
Ms Redmond said that Alliance had also carried out research into members' experiences of long Covid during 2020 with follow-ups in 2022 which highlighted the challenges sufferers continued to experience in "being believed and understood".
Discussing the findings - based on a survey of 1000 people across all 32 council areas - Ms Redmond said: "The things that really stood out from that research was that people were very much shocked by the experience they had of being diagnosed with a long-term condition and the challenges they'd had of having that experience believed by the healthcare system.
"They raised concerns about battling to receive a diagnosis, that the range of symptoms they were experiencing not really being accepted as part of the condition.
"They talked about the significant impact that it was having on their daily life - many people having to leave work; having to rely on friends and family for support for the caring responsibilities that they had in life; that they were having to spend a huge amount of time researching support and treatment options; some describing having to look for private support and treatment.
"Some did describe the support they were receiving from the health service as good, and good support from GPs and others, but they typically tended to describe themselves as 'lucky'."
- READ MORE: From Long Covid to PANDAS - are we finally unravelling a cure for post-viral illnesses?
- READ MORE: Alzheimer's boss says lockdown caused 'levels of distress' to carers that he had never seen before
- READ MORE: Boris Johnson - Covid 'just nature's way of dealing with old people'
Asked by Stuart Gale KC, lead counsel for the inquiry, whether scepticism about the condition "seemed to permeate both the medical profession and the public", Ms Redmond agreed that it did.
Ms Redmond also told the inquiry that people living with long-term conditions or disabilities, and their carers, felt "overlooked" in the "public narrative" about Covid.
She said: "What we heard was that the way in which it was presented as something which only older people were at risk of also meant that many people living with disabled children, people who were higher risk because they were immunocompromised or for other reasons, their circumstances were overlooked and they weren't seen as visible in terms of the risk that this presented for them."
She added that many also felt abandoned in the move towards a "living with Covid" strategy, which has seen mitigations such as masks and testing dropped - including in healthcare.
"They felt that the narrative of 'don't worry, most of you are okay', carry on about your business, really made it so that those who were at higher risk had to be extra careful, extra cautious in the choices that they made, and I would add that that is how people still feel...they are having to navigate those decisions really by themselves without a huge amount of support available."
Ms Redmond referenced a comment made by one participant at Alliance's Carers' Parliament event last year, who said they had been advised by their GP to continue wiping down packaging and mail.
She said the carer told her it feels as though "'the rest of the world has moved on and we haven't - it feels like people think Covid 19 never happened. You get your vaccinations and boosters but you're just left to get on with it'."
The inquiry, before Lord Brailsford, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here