Nearly eight months after voting to shut down six library branches, Aberdeen City Council says it is reconsidering.
But campaigners are wondering whether it is too little, too late.
A controversial decision to close Cornhill, Cults, Ferryhill, Kaimhill, Northfield and Woodside Libraries came at the council’s budget meeting in March.
Since then, a community campaign has urged the council to reconsider.
At the time of the original decision, the city was facing a £47 million deficit.
Cuts to arts and leisure, transportation and education meant that nurseries, pools, gyms and school bus routes were shut down.
Although some services have since been reinstated – either through corporate or Government intervention– most of the cuts look permanent.
READ MORE: Protestors against library closures at Aberdeen council meeting
Now in late autumn, Aberdeen’s libraries appear stuck in Limbo.
Campaigners from the Save Aberdeen Libraries group sought legal consultation from the Govan Law Centre in the spring.
They were told that the closures may have been unlawful because they didn’t consider how closures might impact residents with “protected characteristics”, such as age or disability.
Some eligible residents launched petitions on behalf of multiple branches, raising the potential for a judicial review of the council’s decision-making process.
To reconcile with the public outrage – and perhaps avoid further legal action – the city council announced in September that it would reconsider its decision.
READ MORE: Aberdeen library closure campaigners 'consider legal action'
A public consultation, which began on September 11 and closes on November 6, was also launched. The key feature is a series of focus groups, each featuring up to 10 participants and hosted by library staff.
Three meetings were scheduled for each affected branch: one evening session, one daytime session, and one online session via Teams.
Officers will review information from the consultation and present it at the full council meeting in December, with an aim to make a final decision on whether to reopen some or all of the branches.
But the reality on the ground has changed since March. And campaigners worry that the consultation has come too late for it to be a fair fight.
After the council removed books, DVDs, magazines and newspapers from closed branches, many sites have sat empty for months.
At Cults Library, shelving and furniture have been almost completely removed. Toys and soft seating from Cornhill Library now fill out the children’s section at Central Library.
If the council decides in December to reopen any of the branches, it’s unclear how long it will take to restore services.
Added to this, a decision to reopen the branches might not guarantee their futures.
READ MORE: Yousaf announces council tax freeze to help with cost-of-living crisis
The council’s finances ahead of the 2024 budget season are nearly as bleak as they were in the spring.
After cutting £46.6 million this year, helped in part by £280,000 saved from closing libraries, Aberdeen faces another deficit of more than £40 million.
According to a report from the Accounts Commission and Audit Scotland, 78 per cent of local authorities in the UK are facing a large or very large budget gap.
The report also found that libraries were severely affected by the Covid-19 pandemic and have shown little sign of recovery. And more than two-thirds of local authorities facing shortages have identified libraries as a service at risk of cuts.
And with the SNP Government promising to fund a council tax freeze, there are new questions as to whether this funding will be enough to help councils close the gap and if there is enough to go around.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel