STATE-backed NatWest Group, owner of Royal Bank of Scotland, was responsible for a “number of serious failings” in its treatment of Nigel Farage, which saw confidential details of the former UKIP leader’s financial affairs leaked by ex-chief executive Dame Alison Rose to the BBC, an independent report has found.
The Edinburgh-based institution admitted that there were “clear shortcomings” in the decision of Coutts, its private banking operation, to close the accounts of Mr Farage, “as well as failures in how we communicated with him and in relation to client confidentiality”.
In a difficult day for the bank, which is 38.9% owned by UK taxpayers, the lender also underlined the pressure from customers moving balances from current accounts to interest-bearing savings accounts, to take advantage of higher interest rates.
Shares initially plummeted by 18%, the biggest intra-day fall since the Brexit vote in June 2016, as investors reacted to a margin downgrade by the bank, before staging a partial recovery. The stock closed te day down 11.6%, or 23.8p, at 182p.
READ MORE: Royal Bank owner spooks stock market as Hallowe'en nears
An independent review commissioned by NatWest, carried out by law firm Travers Smith, found the move to shut the accounts of Mr Farage had been lawful and had been “predominantly a commercial decision”. It noted that Coutts considered its relationship with Mr Farage to be “commercially unviable” because it was “significantly loss-making”.
However, the report also found Coutts had weighed up perceived risks to its reputation, “in the eyes of its stakeholders”, from public statements made by the politician “on issues such as the environment, race, gender and migration”.
It was considered that such statements did not align with NatWest Group’s “purpose”. But the report found that while reputational risk and non-alignment of purpose had been supporting factors, they had not determined the decision to close the accounts.
Mr Farage branded the report a "whitewash" and "laughable". He said: “Travers Smith has taken a very mealy-mouthed approach to this complex issue.
“The law firm argues that my political views 'not aligning with those of the bank' was not in itself a political decision. This is laughable.”
NatWest commissioned Travers Smith to review Coutts’ decision to close the accounts of Mr Farage and the circumstances which led to confidential information about his financial affairs being leaked to the BBC by Dame Alison.
READ MORE: Chivas Brothers reveals plans to build distillery on Islay
The BBC initially reported that Mr Farage had his accounts closed for commercial reasons, but it subsequently emerged that concerns had been expressed by some managers about his political views. That came after Mr Farage has requested the release of a subject access request.
Travers Smith concluded that a decision taken in May last year to continue to classify Mr Farage as a politically exposed person was incorrect.
Dame Alison stepped down in late July after admitting to being the source of stories about Mr Farage’s accounts being closed which appeared in the BBC, having initially retained the support of the board, including chairman Sir Howard Davies.
No decision has yet has been reached on the exit remuneration of Ms Rose, after it emerged in August that she was in line for a £2.43 million pay-off under the terms of her 12-month notice period.
City watchdog the Financial Conduct Authority said separately yesterday that it was conducting supervisory work into governance, systems and controls at both NatWest and Coutts to identify and address any significant shortcomings.
READ MORE: Bumper pay-off to ex-boss hangs over Edinburgh-based bank
Sir Howard, who reiterated yesterday that he will remain in post until April, when his nine-year tenure as chairman will end, said: “This report sets out a number of serious failings in the treatment of Mr Farage. Although Travers Smith confirm the lawful basis for the exit decision, the findings set out clear shortcomings in how it was reached as well as failures in how we communicated with him and in relation to client confidentiality. We apologise once again to Mr Farage for how he has been treated. His experience fell short of the standards that any customer should expect.
"Our job now is to make sure that does not happen again. The bank is committed to implementing all the recommendations made by Travers Smith and we are making substantive changes to our policies and procedures, in particular to ensure that the lawfully protected beliefs or opinions of customers do not play any role in our decision making.
"The board is considering the findings and deciding on the appropriate outcomes on other matters. It is important we have regard to all necessary processes and due consideration of issues including the bank's obligations around privacy and confidentiality."
On the remuneration of Dame Alison, Sir Howard said a decision would be announced after the bank had given full regard to all the “necessary processes”.
Phase one of the Travers Smith report was published as the bank reported a pre-tax operating profit of £1.33 billion for the third quarter, up from £1.09bn at the same stage last year.
The bank said its net interest margin had fallen amid a “significant change” in customer behaviour over the quarter, as people moved balances to lower-margin fixed term accounts to take advantage of higher interest rates.
Interim chief executive Paul Thwaite said: “That has obviously involved us paying more on savings accounts to our customers, and you can see the impact of that on our incomes and our margins. What the future looks like depends on the trajectory for base rates. Our current view is that base rates will remain at current levels.”
Mortgage margins have also came under pressure as the “higher margin Covid-era book rolls off and is replaced at lower margins”.
The bank revised down its guidance on net interest margin to “greater than” 3%; it has been 3.11% for the year to date, though was 19 basis points lower in the third quarter at 2.94%, compared with the previous quarter.
The Bank of England base rate is currently 5.25%.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel