Campaigners are set to lodge a legal complaint over the use of the word ‘sustainable’ by the Scottish salmon farming industry - which, they claim, is “greenwashing”.
The charity Wildfish and the Coastal Communities Network Scotland (CCN) will today submit a dossier of complaints to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) which is currently investigating green claims by food and drinks companies.
In their submission, the coalition cite examples of use of the term 'sustainable' by the industry body Salmon Scotland, as well as listing impacts on the environment and wildlife.
Rachel Mulrenan, Scotland Director at WildFish, said: “As the CMA recognises, in the minds of consumers a ‘sustainable’ product is one which has a positive environmental impact, or at least no adverse impact.
"As our complaint makes clear, the Scottish salmon farming industry can make no such claim – from the unsustainable use of wild fish to feed farmed-salmon, to the dispersal of toxic chemicals into Scottish sea lochs, to the negative impact on protected species such as wild Atlantic salmon, this is an inherently unsustainable industry producing an unsustainable product.”
Among the statements it draws attention to are some published on Salmon Scotland’s website. One, for instance, a response to the Scottish Government’s Vision for Sustainable Aquaculture, observes that “the fish grown sustainably in the sea off the west coast and the islands are one of the most nutritious foods to eat given their high protein and vitamin D levels.”
Another features on a page covering the Code of Good Practice for Finfish Aquaculture, in which the trade body notes, “Scottish aquaculture products meet the high-quality standards consistent with current and future sustainable development.”
Yet another is in a news story in which Salmon Scotland heralds the fact that it has joined the Paris-based organisation Worldchefs “as demand increases at home and abroad for fresh, nutritious and sustainable salmon in restaurants”.
The unsustainable impacts highlighted in the dossier include, says Wildfish, “The negative impact of parasites and escaped fish from Scottish salmon farms on wild salmon; high mortality rates on the farms; unsustainable use of other fish species as parasite ‘cleaner fish’; increasing use of antibiotics on Scottish salmon farms.”
John Aitchison, spokesperson for CCN, said: “Many Scottish coastal communities have realised how much harm salmon farming can do. Jobs in these communities depend on the sea being clean and healthy, so it is no surprise that this industry has lost its social licence to operate. Every salmon farm is allowed to discharge all its excrement and pesticides into the sea.
"They all release parasitic sea lice that can threaten wild salmon and sea trout. They bring feed ingredients from across the globe and then fly much of their produce to the USA and the Far East. To make matters worse, this industry wants to double production by 2030, despite farmed fish mortality spiralling upwards, driven by climate change-enhanced diseases and parasites, and the inhumane treatments it administers for these problems. To call any of this behaviour ‘sustainable’ is unacceptable.”
The salmon farming industry is not new to criticisms about its sustainability claims. In 2019, the Scottish producer Loch Duart stopped advertising itself as ‘sustainable’, following an investigation by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).
READ MORE: Scottish salmon: What dead fish I saw tells us about sector
READ MORE: 210,000 salmon dead at one salmon farm in one month
Earlier this year, the CMA announced, following its investigation into the fashion industry, that it would be investigating green claims made by companies in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods sector, which includes food and drink products.
The complaint also comes in the wake of news that Salmon Scotland is applying to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs for its protected name to be changed from ‘Scottish farmed salmon’ to ‘Scottish salmon’. It said that “the term farmed has become redundant” since nearly all salmon produced in Scotland is farmed.
This move has been criticised by environmental and welfare NGOs and campaigners. Ms Mulrenan said: “As sustainability issues become increasingly important for consumers, we have here not one, but two ways in which the Scottish salmon farming industry is attempting to pull the wool over consumers’ eyes."
A spokesperson for Salmon Scotland said: “We have been in touch with the CMA who tell us they have yet to receive anything from these groups. This is simply the latest stunt from two anti-salmon organisations that are campaigning to ban the Scottish salmon sector, which would wipe out thousands of jobs, decimate coastal communities and jeopardise sustainable economic growth for Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel