The backdrop to UK Labour's conference in Liverpool was very much the party's victory in the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election last Thursday.
Michael Shanks, the new MP for the constituency, had a star turn on the main stage on Monday, introducing his boss Anas Sarwar who gave his "report" on Scotland to the party faithful. Mr Sarwar was cheered as he told the audience that Scottish Labour can beat the SNP in seats “across Scotland”.
"No SNP MP can sit safely, taking their communities for granted as so many have," he declared.
The focus was picked up by Sir Keir Starmer in his keynote address the following day when he vowed to put Scotland at the “heart of a Britain to last” and said by-election showed that Scotland “can lead the way to a Labour government”.
He also mocked the SNP for trying to “present nationalism as a bridge to the world” when it can “barely provide a ferry out of the Hebrides”.
The Labour leader also confirmed that should Labour gain power it would establish a publicly owned clean energy company with its headquarters north of the border that would be expected to create thousands of jobs.
“Although Great British Energy will be a shared mission, Scotland has the skills, Scotland has the ingenuity, and Scotland is at the heart of a Britain built to last. That’s what the people of Rutherglen voted for,” he said.
And he also warned against complacency implicitly suggesting if Scots didn't like events south of the Border a demand for independence would strengthen.
“But be under no illusions we must earn every vote, and we must understand that the Scottish people are not just looking at us; they’re also looking at Britain,” he said.
But besides Mr Sarwar's speech, an address by shadow Scottish Secretary Ian Murray and a couple of fringe meetings including one on constitutional reform, Scotland did not feature heavily on the conference's agenda.
There was no explicit mention of what, if any extra powers could come to Holyrood under a Labour government - if the party does put forward such proposals perhaps the leaders want to wait until closer to the general election.
Sir Keir's speech while clearly enthusing members with its focus on removing the Conservative government from power and with a promise to “walk towards a decade of national renewal” and “face down the age of insecurity” was not exactly full of policies he would implement to see these changes come about.
And the plans he did outline were ones that would be introduced only south of the border. He raised the prospect of reforming the NHS in England saying if his government didn't bring in new changes the health service would "remain on life support".
One of the biggest announcements was a plan to "bulldoze through" the "restrictive planning system" and build £1.5 million new homes. But such a policy again would only come into effect south of the Border where "the next generation of Labour new towns" would be built.
And when he discussed a new generation of technical colleges to provide training for future workers this policy too had a England only focus.
He talked of "training lab workers in Derbyshire", "automotive engineers in Wolverhampton", "computer scientists in Manchester", "nuclear scientists in Somerset", "builders in Staffordshire" and "toolmakers in Hull".
Perhaps this is an aspect of devolution which does present a challenge for UK party leaders. If they do suggest policies relating to health, education or housebuilding - as all the above listed do - they risk the accusation that they are stepping into the remit of devolved areas. However, by not talking about issues that are devolved to Scotland they then give the impression - and accusation - that they are ignoring Scotland or not interested.
Maybe a way around this challenge is to mention how some similar ambitions would take shape under a Holyrood Labour government. Admittedly it sounds like a footnote, but perhaps a better option than just leaving out the country.
But while Scotland was absent from some of the policy conversation it was very much present in the Labour's goal to achieve power.
There was no doubt that the conference was all about putting Labour on an election footing and in that regard events in Scotland, with the SNP hit by troubles and Mr Shanks' by-election win last Thursday, has helped energise the party leadership and activists ahead of what will be a busy and important 12 months of campaigning.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel