Polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice has said Labour’s overwhelming win in the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election could put the party on course for Downing Street.
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said the Labour Party is “back on the pitch”.
And Sir Keir Starmer has hailed the result as “seismic ".
By contrast, Humza Yousaf said it was “disappointing”. But what does it all mean?
The SNP has been the dominant force in Scottish politics for more than a decade, sweeping elections to both Holyrood and Westminster.
The party has long been regarded as defying political gravity, only to come down with a bump duirng the eary hours of the morning.
Losing to Labour by such a wide margin could be a sign that things are changing in Scotland – with Labour finally on the ascendant after years in the doldrums.
But by-elections are unique. One-off votes where people register their disapproval with the party in power before returning to the fold in the next General Election.
We want to know what you think – Are we seeing the end of a political era in Scotland?
Vote now in our online poll:
READ MORE:
Stephen Flynn says SNP must confront 'the scale of challenge' it faces
Rutherglen and Hamilton West: Labour score historic victory
Scottish politics has 'fundamentally changed', Anas Sarwar claims
Sir John Curtice, professor of politics at Strathclyde University, said “these are the kind of swings you saw” before Sir Tony Blair swept to power in 1997.
He said the Tamworth by-election, triggered by the resignation of the former Tory whip Chris Pincher, which will be held on October 19, will “tell us much more than Rutherglen does about the probability of the party to win a general election”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel