Voters in Rutherglen and Hamilton West head to the polls today, as one of the longest by-elections campaigns in British history comes to a conclusion.
The result is expected at around 1am, with Labour the favourites to take the seat won by the SNP in 2019.
Both parties were out on the campaign trail yesterday.
READ MORE: Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election: Who are the candidates?
Speaking to journalists in Cambuslang, Anas Sarwar said he was confident his candidate Michael Shanks would win.
“We’ve had seismic by-elections before, and it’s fair to say that the Labour Party in recent times has been on the wrong side of those seismic by-elections.”
“I believe this has the potential to be a seismic by-election and then as a launchpad as we head towards that next general election,” he added.
“We approach that with excitement, we approach that with confidence, but we do it with a hunger and desire to recognise that we have come a long way in terms of persuading people that the Scottish Labour Party is back, and we’ve still got a long way to go to earn the trust of the Scottish people, and I’m absolutely determined to do that.”
Ms Loudon, was in Hamilton with SNP depute leader Keith Brown and MP Kirsty Blackman. She was asked if she was confident of a win.
“Yes, yes, I’m feeling confident,” she said.
“We’ve been working really hard, we will continue to work hard right up until 10pm tomorrow.”
Asked what gives her such confidence when Mr Sarwar also appears to be looking forward to a win, Ms Loudon said: “It’s coming from the conversations on the doorstep.
“I wouldn’t be in this election if I didn’t think I was the best candidate to represent people here.
“What drives me is making sure that people in this area get a fair crack of the whip.
“That’s the message I’m taking out to people and that’s what people are looking for, and they’re responding to it well.”
READ MORE: Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election: Everything you need to know
The vote was sparked when Margaret Ferrier was ousted in Scotland’s first ever recall petition at the start of August.
The petition was triggered when the MP was suspended from the Commons for 30 days for multiple Covid rule breaches.
Ms Ferrier won the seat for the SNP in 2019 with a majority of 5,230.
Labour now needs a swing of just 5% to send Mr Shanks to Westminster.
The Scottish Conservatives were a distant third at the last general election, winning just 8,000 votes, far behind Labour's 18,000 and the SNP's 23,000.
The party's candidate Thomas Kerr, had led a low-profile campaign. He said if he was elected, he would be “fully focused” on tackling the “real priorities” of constituents.
“In sharp contrast, the SNP candidate has made it clear they will be relentlessly pushing for another independence referendum at every opportunity,” he added.
Scottish Liberal Democrat candidate Gloria Adebo said she would be a "champion" for the South Lanarkshire seat.
"It needs someone who will stand up against SNP centralisation and Conservative chaos.
“People are sick of it. We even found an SNP party member who said their vote was up for grabs because of the actions of various nationalist politicians.
“I would urge that voter and ever voter who wants to see action on the cost of living and the state of the NHS to vote for me and the Scottish Liberal Democrats."
READ MORE: Fears over Rutherglen and Hamilton West voter ID requirement
Scottish Green candidate Cameron Eadie said a vote for his party "would send shockwaves through our politics."
He said: “We don’t have time to waste. The world is burning around us, but the Prime Minister's solution is to double down on fossil fuels.
“The fate of my generation and all future generations will be decided by what we do in the months and years ahead. We need an urgent shift to a renewable future.
“The people of Rutherglen and Hamilton West have the opportunity to lead the change."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel