Sir Tom Hunter and Lord Willie Haughey have welcomed the decision by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to delay the abolition of sales of new fossil fuel-propelled vehicles, welcoming the move as pragmatic.
Speaking on the Go Radio Business Show, Sir Tom commented: “I’ll just say that I admire some qualities of ‘Dishy Rishi’ and I think he’s certainly being practical.
“I think he’s saying, yes, net zero by 2050, we all still want to do it, but as the facts change, we need to look and see if our policies, which were written some time ago, are still relevant to get us there.
“He is coming out and saying that we cannot get to net zero and bankrupt the British people, which is quite a clever line. So I kind of take it at face value and say, okay, I understand.”
Lord Willie Haughey, however, did question the PM making his announcement without first having had official conversations with car manufacturers in the UK.
“It was a week after BMW announced they were going to spend a fortune building the electric Minis in the UK,” he pointed out.
“I know Ford and some people had things to say about it, but I think the big manufacturers had a kind of sigh of relief and were quite happy with this news.
“Well, I’ve not seen them all over the papers the next day, all of them jumping up and down. But what’s particularly interesting following on from that announcement is that China – and we talk about moving away from gas because we don’t want to be dependent on Russia and we don't want to get caught up in the politics of war in relation to our utilities.
“If we go forward with the whole electric car thing, China and only China will be responsible for producing 70% of all the batteries in the world for electric cars.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here