The Scottish Parliament is "weaker" because of the Bute House Agreement, the former Scottish Green MSP Andy Wightman has said.
He is the latest senior figure to question the partnership deal between the SNP and his old party.
Last month, Robin Harper who served as a Lothians MSP between 1999 and 2011 and was co-convener of the Greens from 2004-2008, said the party had "lost the plot."
READ MORE: SNP civil war in East Kilbride as MSP urges party members to unseat MP
Mr Wightman, who quit the party in December 2020, following a row about the party's stance on transgender issues, told the Holyrood Sources podcast: "The only reason the Greens are in a coalition is because the SNP wanted it. And I never quite understood the rationale for that.
"I mean, Humza Yousaf defends it on the basis that they want a stable majority in Parliament and that's understandable, I suppose. But from a parliamentary point of view, you know, in the Parliament I was in, the executive did not have a majority."
Mr Wightman was a member of the cross-party committee set up to investigate how the Scottish Government bungled a probe into sexual misconduct allegations made against Alex Salmond in 2018.
The former first minister had the exercise set aside in a judicial review in January 2019, showing it had been “tainted by apparent bias.”
For months, the Scottish Government refused to hand over key legal advice to the committee.
It was only when the then deputy first minister John Swinney looked certain to lose a no confidence vote in parliament that they relented.
Mr Wightman told the podcast the minority government meant "that we could have meaningful votes of confidence in the Deputy First Minister, who was refusing until 6pm the day before to hand over critical evidence to the committee investigating harassment handling in the Scottish Government."
He added: "It meant that opposition parties can be doing work together to constructively come to amendments to various Scottish Government bills.
"And therefore parliament was stronger. So one of the consequences of this coalition is that parliament is weaker. And it's weaker because Humza Yousaf doesn't want it to be weaker."
A spokesperson for the Scottish Greens said: "Today of all days, as Westminster commits to a climate-wrecking oil field in Rosebank, it is clear why our positive green vision is so vital for people and planet."
READ MORE: Ayr Station Hotel must not be demolished after fire
Mr Wightman resigned from the party after an internal party argument over an amendment to the Forensic Medical Services (Victims of Sexual Offences) (Scotland) Bill regarding a sexual assault victim’s ability to choose who examines them.
It replaced the word “gender” with “sex.”
However, the Greens, including Mr Wightman all voted against.
In his resignation letter, he said he only did so due to a threat of “complaints and disciplinary action leading to possible suspension, deselection or expulsion”.
Mr Wightman added that he was previously censured by colleagues for attending of a public meeting at Edinburgh University in June 2019, which included gender-critical speakers.
“It has become evident to me that the sort of open-minded public engagement I would like to see take place on this topic is incompatible with a party that has become very censorious of any deviation from an agreed line.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel