Humza Yousaf has defended a decision by Scotland’s state-funded investment bank to put £9million into the disastrous deposit return scheme despite the potential loss of every penny.
The First Minister said the Scottish National Investment Bank (SNIB) had been “right” to loan the money to the scheme’s administrators Circularity Scotland Limited.
The firm collapsed in June with debts of more than £86million and assets of just £2.1m.
The SNIB today published its accounts for 2022/23 which showed the value of its loan to Circularity Scotland was now potentially worth £0, or nothing at all.
The bank said it had already reduced the value of its investment to £4.5m in March 2023, because of problems over the depository return scheme (DRS) going live in August.
READ MORE: SNP MSPs to meet tonight to decide Fergus Ewing sanction
In April this year, it was confirmed the scheme would be delayed until March 2024, only for the UK Government to insist on changes which the Scottish Government rejected.
Faced with the prospect of the DRS taking until 2025 to begin, the drinks companies involved withdrew their support from Circularity Scotland and it collapsed.
The SNIB said this “post balance sheet event” was not reflected in its accounts, but admitted its investment into Circulairty Scotland Ltd was “now valued at a range of between £0-£1m”.
The DRS was supposed to improve recycling and reduce litter by adding a 20p returnable deposit to all drink bottles and cans sold in Scotland.
However many small businesses warned they could not afford the extra cost to them, and the UK Government refused to let it include glass, fatally undermining it.
Mr Yousaf was asked about the DRS and SNIB at his bi-annual meeting with Holyrood’s committee conveners.
Claire Baker, the Labour convenor of the Economy and Fair Work Committee, asked the First Minister what lessons had been learned about the influence of Government policy on the bank’s decision-making.
Mr Yousaf said the bank’s decision to loan the £9m to Circularity Scotland Ltd had been taken independently by the £2bn organisation and praised its chair and chief executive.
READ MORE: SNP civil war in East Kilbride as MSP urges party members to unseat MP
He also said the bank had to be able to make “calculated risks” based on its expertise, and said they had done a “good job” leveraging private investment.
He went on: “In terms of lessons learnt in relation to deposit return scheme and Circularity Scotland, There are a number of lessons, undoubtedly, to learn.
“I'm happy to give very detailed written correspondence to Claire Baker, but what I would say is that it’s a source of great frustration.
“I won't go over all of that history of where we are with the deposit return scheme and where we've ended up.
“But the Prime Minister's most recent announcements give me little hope at all that there will be a UK aligned scheme by the time that the UK Government had suggested there would be in 2025. “So we've had our own scheme virtually torpedoed and no UK scheme in sight.
“So I think it was right that SNIB invested. It was a decision, obviously, for them to invest in Circularity Scotland at the time.
“I'm just frustrated that we have ended up in the position that we are in and unable to take forward a Scotland-only scheme that was ready to go and would have, I think, been very helpful in relation to reducing litter on our streets.”
The DRS was piloted by Green minister Lorna Slater, who faced calls to resign after it ran into problems.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel