Relatives have vowed that they "will go down fighting" in a campaign to save a much-loved Lanarkshire care home from closure.
Families of the elderly residents at McClymont House in Lanark were blindsided by proposals to shut the premises and transfer residents into other homes amid a £7 million black hole in the local social care budget.
The council-owned home is consistently rated among the best in Scotland by inspectors, but South Lanarkshire officials want to replace it with "progressive" social housing as part of a money-saving "repurposing" of residential care.
The 27-bed facility currently has 17 residents, many in their 80s and 90s with advanced dementia or Alzheimer's.
A petition against the closure has already attracted more than 2,500 signatures amid a backlash from the local community.
READ MORE: Vacancies in the Scottish care sector highest since records began
Allanna Macdonald, whose 92-year-old mother is bedridden with advanced Alzheimer's and dementia has been at McClymont for five and a half years, said: "My mum would not survive a move - 100% she would not survive it - so for them to say that there was no detrimental effect on moving elderly people is completely untrue.
"I find it disgusting. It's just the easiest thing: 'we'll save money if we close that home'."
Prior to going into McClymont, her mother lived at home with four visits a day by carers but her illness meant she was often found in the morning "wet and cold on the floor" having been unable to get to the bathroom.
Ms Macdonald said she and her sister have been delighted by the quality of care and accommodation provided, which includes everything from a Baby Grand piano and a fish tank to regular entertainment and birthday tea parties.
She said: "The staff go above and beyond. We visited a lot of private homes before mum got that room and I wouldn't have sent her to any of them to be truthful.
"We won't go down without a fight. I would barricade myself in my Mum's room if I had to - they can take me out kicking and fighting."
Families were informed of the planned closure in an email "out of the blue" from South Lanarkshire Integrated Joint Board (IJB) on September 14 - just a day after receiving letters notifying them that the fees were to increase by around £25 a week, with costs backdated to April.
READ MORE: Growing old, and staying well? Ageism, and the 'pandemic of frailty' left by lockdowns
However, an emergency meeting of the IJB on September 19 ended in deadlock after the voting panel - made up of four South Lanarkshire councillors, two Labour and two SNP, and four NHS Lanarkshire representatives - were split four to four.
If no agreement can be reached, decision-making could ultimately pass to the Scottish Government.
Professor Soumen Sengupta, chief officer for the South Lanarkshire IJB said the proposals put forward to IJB members were “not to close the homes but to carry out a consultation” with families, residents and stakeholders in relation to proposed closures.
Prof Sengupta said: “No agreement was reached around the proposals. At this point we are not at a stage of moving to formal consultation.
"Reports taken to the IJB over many months have underlined the seriousness of the budget gap, with an anticipated £26million shortfall in social care funding for 2024/25.
"Members were advised that while this position was due to forces outside of our control, extraordinarily tough choices would need to be confronted if we are to prioritise and protect the most at-risk and vulnerable in our communities.”
In its report ahead of the meeting, IJB bosses said "difficult choices" had to be made in light of a £7m gap in its 2023/24 budget.
Closing McClymont House and a second council-run care home in Hamilton, the 16-bed Dewar House, was projected to deliver savings of £1.5m annually - including £786,000 from McClymont.
The IJB stressed that the move came in a context of "significant investment" of £27.3m in community health and social care services since 2021, including an expansion of hospital-at-home.
READ MORE: Newton House care home - workers describe 'shocking' levels of staff turnover
It added that previous public consultations had identified keeping people in their own homes for longer as a "key priority" and that "exploratory discussions" have already identified McClymont as a potential site for redevelopment into progressive social housing.
The model envisioned would "[maintain] a level of independent living for tenants in suitable housing for individuals with varying needs" with levels of support "adjusted according to the assessed needs of those tenants".
There has been anger, however, at what sources describe as "mistruths".
The IJB report states that only 17 out of the 27 beds at McClymont are occupied and that one of its three nine-bed wings has been decommissioned "to minimise unnecessary operating costs" amid a "decrease in demand and ongoing recruitment challenges".
However, the Herald understands that home's management has come under pressure over the past year not to recruit any new staff or to open the empty wing to new residents despite regular phonecalls from people keen to secure a place for their loved ones in the highly-rated home.
This has led to a perception that McClymont House is being "run down" on purpose, to justify its closure.
The IJB report insists that there are 10 other care homes in the Lanark area providing a mix of residential and nursing care which combined have 41 bed vacancies to accommodate the 32 McClymont and Dewar House residents.
As a result, the IJB said there is "not expected to be any adverse impact on the health and social care outcomes" for residents.
READ MORE: The drug landscape for Alzheimer's is changing - but can the NHS adapt?
Relatives counter that this contradicts "mountains of research" about the harm sudden changes in environment cause to people with cognitive impairment.
Dale Rob, whose 84-year-old mother has vascular dementia and has been in McClymont for a year, said even afternoon trips out of the home can be "unsettling".
She said: "Relocation would be disastrous. We don't want the stress and angstof taking her away from anything familiar.
"We've spent a lot of time as a family getting our heads around the whole 'put your mum in a home situation'.
"Having taken just over a year to come to terms with that the last thing we want to do is cause any further angst and upset to my mum or ourselves.
"I work for a local authority, I know how this goes, but it's a quick fix to fill a budget gap that it going to put vulnerable people at a greater risk than they need to be."
Phil Dibdin's mother Rebecca Parker lived at McClymont for six and a half years until her death in 2022, making headlines in 2020 when she raised over £10,000 for the NHS by playing the home's piano every day for 100 days.
He previously fought proposals to close McClymont five years ago and described the latest plans as "despicable".
He said: "Instead of closing it they should be proud to have such a facility. If they had any type of innovation they could use that as a blueprint to train up other homes.
"Instead they're spinning this story that folk don't need care homes - they're going to be looked after at home. That's a great aspiration but it's a false economy.
"In the 18 months before my mother went into McClymont she spent a month convalescing in Lockhart hospital, two weeks in Wishaw General, she was taken away once by ambulance, and she was at A&E twice.
"In the six and a half years she was in McClymont, nothing - she never had to go near the hospital.
"My mother-in-law, she went downhill with dementia. In her own house - didn't know what time it was, where she was, barely recognising any relatives, and getting four 15 minute carer visits a day.
"Nothing against them - they're doing their best - but the other 23 hours she's staring at a wall, and they're telling us that's better than being in McClymont?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel