Patrick Harvie has accused the Scottish Conservatives of having a “damn nerve” after they claimed the Scottish Government were on course to miss a target to install 30,000 electric car-charging stations.
Douglas Ross’s party has urged ministers in Edinburgh to follow the lead of Rishi Sunak after he delayed a ban on new petrol and diesel cars by five years until 2035.
The Scottish Government has already warned that pushing back the deadline will risk Scotland’s target for net zero by 2045.
However, on Sunday morning, there was some confusion over the Prime Minister’s car postponement when Defence Secretary Grant Shapps claimed that there had been no change.
READ MORE: 'Hell on wheels': The bitter battle to complete Edinburgh's tram line
Figures from ChargePlace Scotland, the charging network owned by the Scottish Government, showed 169 chargers had been added between October 2022 and August 2023.
Meanwhile, separate figures released by the Scottish Government earlier this year said there were almost 4,000 charging stations across Scotland as of June 2023.
Ministers have previously acknowledged that 30,000 will be needed to meet the anticipated increase in demand for electric vehicle charging points, which the Tories have suggested could take until 2042 – 12 years after the deadline.
“I think they've got a damn nerve, to be honest,” Mr Harvie told the BBC’s Sunday Show when asked about the criticism.
He said the rollout would be hampered by last week’s announcement from No 10, as businesses would be put off by the uncertainty.
“You need not just public charging points,” the Active Travel minister said, “Which we have been rolling out, but you need all sorts of other organisations to start installing their own charging points as well.
“You need industry to invest and now without that sense of when policy change is coming when regulatory change is coming, why would they bother investing in the UK, given that lack of clarity?”
He said many of the levers that would impact on the rollout lay with the UK Government.
“Ofgem, that's the UK energy regulator, makes decisions about where grid upgrades are going to happen, that's for charging points, that's for shifting to electricity for heating as well.
“There are all sorts of reasons around decarbonisation and why we need those grid upgrades, but it's the UK that makes those decisions.
“The biggest missed opportunity in all of this is to change the way the energy market works around those grid upgrades.
“How do we pay for them, but also the pricing? At the moment, Scotland is generating this cheap, green abundant renewable electricity, but that cheapness of generation is not being passed on to billpayers because the UK sets an artificial link between the retail price of gas and electricity.
“With a Prime Minister who was genuinely committed to making Net Zero affordable for people, that's the announcement he would have made last week, break the link between gas and electricity prices, you make zero emissions heating and electric transport more affordable.”
READ MORE: UK auto: Electric options fail to fill the used car void
The Scottish Green party co-convenor said the Tory party was “creating a new wedge issue.”
“We know that the population as a whole has very few people who are outright climate deniers. People want to do the right thing. They want climate action. They see the urgency of the planetary emergency that we're living in at the moment.“
“We're now seeing outright climate denial on a scale we haven't seen before and the Tories love it,” he added.
Mr Harvie was also asked about direct action by groups like Just Stop Oil and This is Rigged, and whether he thought it was time to break the law on the climate emergency.
“I have immense empathy with anyone who struggles with this question, and many people have found themselves effectively feeling disempowered and thinking that the only way they can take some power into their hands is to take part in direct action,” the minister said.
“I'll never condemn that,” he added. “It should be peaceful direct action. I've taken part in peaceful direct action myself in the past.”
“The only thing that is going to prevent people from taking ever more desperate action is the government bringing the urgency to this that it demands.
“The Scottish Government is determined to but we're being held back by a UK government that is saying climate change is our next wedge issue in the next front in the culture war.”
READ MORE: TV Reviews: Chris Packham: Is it Time to Break the Law?
Appearing on the BBC’s Laura Kuennsberg show, Mr Shapps claimed that 2035 was “always the end date for the sale of petrol and diesel cars.”
He said the move related to hybrid cars.
It was then pointed out to him that in March, when he was transport minister, he had said, “our path which is 2030 will see the end of new petrol and diesel.”
Mr Shapps replied: “Of pure petrol and diesel by 2030. That was always the policy. 2035 has always been the final phase out.”
He said: “What’s changed is the sequencing. So in 2030 you can still sell a non-hybrid car under the current plans – that’s the change.”
But the UK Government's own announcement makes clear there has been a change. It reads that “Under revised plans, the Government will: Move back the ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars by five years, so all sales of new cars from 2035 will be zero emission.”
Confused by Grant Shapps this morning seeming to suggest to @vicderbyshire that the government's electric vehicle policy had not, in fact, changed?
— Ben Chu (@BenChu_) September 24, 2023
Best to go back the Government's own announcement, which makes it clear there has been a change👇...https://t.co/1SbXMIEitP pic.twitter.com/d1LfDRUsXG
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel