Two of Scotland’s leading entrepreneurs have lambasted the UK Government for what they see as its mishandling of HS2. Speaking on the Go Radio Business Show with Hunter & Haughey, following revelations Prime Minister Rishi Sunak plans to scrap the northern leg of the high-speed rail project, Lord Willie Haughey said: “The UK Government is getting it from all angles in relation to the retrenching on the HS2 and whether this could have an impact on Scotland and the big question of connecting us to the south of the UK.”
It has been widely reported the PM and Chancellor Jeremy Hunt have been considering proposals to make major cutbacks in talks codenamed Project Redwood.
One cost estimate suggests the Government has already spent £2.3 billion on the second stage of the high-speed railway from Birmingham to Manchester, yet shelving the northern phase would save up to £34bn.
Sir Tom Hunter commented: “I’ve said before HS2 was an analogue answer in a digital world. It started off with a budget of £70 billion but that budget is now actually closer to £100 bn.
“I actually know of a couple of people in England, very wealthy people – well, they are very wealthy now – who for the past four years have been flat out selling everything they can into HS2. They say it’s the best contract they have ever had. Nobody holds them to account. They just keep delivering the stuff and getting paid. So there’s mismanagement here.”
Sir Tom told his radio show co-host: “You and I both know we wouldn’t put government in charge of a sweetie shop. Consider the litany of disasters here in Scotland: the trams, the Parliament . . . and don’t mention the ferries!
“I don’t think HS2 will ever get to Scotland and there are so many other things you could spend billions of pounds on that would actually really help.”
Lord Haughey reiterated his personal belief that allocating infrastructure funding to regional bodies to do their best for levelling up would be more beneficial and financially prudent than creating enormous projects that are centrally controlled.
“Why not dispense the money locally, regionally, and let them make decisions?” he asked. “Making these huge infrastructure decisions has now been proven beyond doubt not to be the best thing for anybody who is trying to level up.”
The Scottish Inter-City Rail Taskforce, set up by the High Speed Rail Group, meanwhile, has noted HS2 delays could be hampering Scotland’s carbon reduction and negatively impacting potential economic growth.
It noted Scotland has been particularly affected by the Department for Transport’s decision to scrap the Golborne link, part of the HS2 Crewe to Manchester scheme that would have seen trains taken off the main route before Manchester and connected to the West Coast Main Line to continue their journey to Glasgow. The aim had been to improve connectivity and journey times to Scotland and allow greater capacity for freight.
Sir Tom pointed out the irony was the decisions were being made by the Conservatives, who traditionally had been viewed as the party with the best understanding of business matters.
“They simply cannot deliver this,” he said. “It defies all common sense. It was a flawed project from the beginning and, yes, right now it’s proven to be so. So, once again, it is the UK taxpayer who is picking up the bill and nobody is being held accountable. I hate it!”
Lord Haughey concluded: “This is a point we make every week on the Business Show: that politics should simply get out the way of business. This was a political decision. It turns out to be another huge infrastructure project that is now doomed to fail.
“When are politicians going to learn to keep out of the way and just put money in the right places with people who know where to spend it best?”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel