This article appears as part of the Unspun: Scottish Politics newsletter.
I cannot and will never be able to know the hell of the parents of the babies murdered by Lucy Letby.
I cannot fathom what it must be to suffer the death of your child and subsequently learn that they were murdered.
For most of us, dear Christ hopefully, the victim’s impact statements read out in Manchester Crown Court on Monday will be the closest glimpse of their nightmare that we will ever experience.
The one that stuck with me was the mother of Child I, speaking about how her daughter had improved in the neonatal unit, how she and her husband thought they would soon be able to take her home, how they brought the car seat into the ward for it to be checked.
A week later their daughter collapsed.
After four attempts Letby had killed her.
“'When they handed (Child I) to us we never wanted to let her go we held her so tight she was our gorgeous little princess and I can’t even begin to explain the pain. When we lost her a part of us died with her.”
Letby wasn’t there. She heard none of it.
I suppose her sentence was never in any doubt. And given that she’s never going to leave prison ever again, the threat of having a few years added on to her jail time for not turning up to court is no real punishment.
The question is though, should she have been forced to be there? Should those found guilty of crimes be compelled to be in court for the sentencing?
It is too late for Letby, but that's exactly what the UK Government are looking to do in England and Wales.
There are, of course, what Keir Starmer described as “practical considerations”.
How do you force someone into court that doesn’t want to be there?
Former senior crown prosecutor Nazir Afzal told the BBC that the only option may be to “Hannibalise” them, that is truss them up on a trolley, straight-jacket and mask, like Anthony Hopkins in The Silence of the Lambs.
Letby was not the first killer to refuse to appear in the dock to face victims’ families.
Earlier this year, Thomas Cashman stayed in his cell rather than take part in proceedings when he was convicted for shooting dead nine-year-old Olivia Pratt-Korbel in Liverpool.
Jordan McSweeney refused to come to court to be sentenced for the killing of Zara Aleena in east London.
In Scotland, the situation is slightly different. Partly because we don’t have whole-life sentences, though judges can impose sentences in which the punishment part effectively amounts to a whole-life term.
Maybe that means there’s more incentive for an offender to turn up and keep on the Sheriff's good side.
Certainly, there doesn’t seem to be much of a problem here.
“In almost 40 years I’ve never seen an accused refuse to come up to court for sentencing,” Thomas Leonard Campbell KC tweeted over the weekend.
Unspun | Neil Mackay: Did MI5 spy on the SNP? Let's look at the evidence
Nevertheless, that it hasn't really happened yet, doesn't mean it might never.
And as Professor James Chalmers from Glasgow University’s School of Law pointed out on social media, there is a “risk of contagion.” That the high-profile coverage of Letby’s refusal may encourage others to follow suit.
On Monday, the Scottish Government said they were looking at the situation here.
“Offenders are brought before the court to hear their sentencing in Scotland,” a spokesman said. “However, there is no statutory law that requires this. We will consider carefully if any new laws are needed in this area.”
But even then, if we change the law and compel someone to be in court who doesn’t want to be there, is that necessarily worthwhile?
As much as we may want to see the whites of the offender’s eyes as the victim impact statements are read out or as the sentencing is delivered, someone with nothing to lose can cause chaos.
“A sentencing process conducted in view of a contemptuous or visibly distraught prisoner may offer little by way of catharsis,” Prof Chalmer pointed out on X.
“This may be an example of the fact that not every problem can be fixed, or at least be fixed in a way which makes things better.”
...enjoyed the article? Sign up for free to the Unspun newsletter and receive it directly to your inbox every weekday night at 7pm. Click here 👈
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel