Kate Forbes has suggested she could have another run at the SNP leadership bid.
The former finance secretary, who narrowly lost out to Humza Yousaf earlier this year, told the Irish Times: “Never say never.”
During the leadership contest against Humza Yousaf and Ash Regan, Ms Forbes said it was “highly highly unlikely” that she would try again if she lost.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes says she 'dodged a bullet' by losing SNP leadership race
Mr Yousaf won the race by 52% to 48% against Ms Forbes on the final count but his time in Bute House been overshadowed ever since by SNP scandal and infighting.
The early weeks of his premiership were derailed by the arrests of senior SNP figures, including Nicola Sturgeon and her husband, former party chief executive Peter Murrell.
Both were released without charge, pending further investigation.
Police are looking into how £660,000 specifically raised for a second referendum was spent.
The SNP has seen their support in the polls slump.
Ms Forbes told the Irish Times: “It's been pretty tough. Fair play to Humza Yousaf. I think it would have been difficult for anybody.
“It's difficult to set out your vision when you're trying to manage these extraordinarily challenging situations, which you're not in control of. But that's not to say that I wouldn't have given it my best shot had I won.'
Asked if she would go for the leadership again if it was available, she said: “Never say never.”
Elsewhere, Ms Forbes told the West Highland Free Press she was “incredibly reluctant” to stand again but added: “The only reason I would not say never is: who can control the way circumstances unfold?
"The membership made their decision and I am not sore about it.
"I respect democracy. The only thing that exercises me is that I think it is high time we had a Highlander at the helm.”
READ MORE: Patrick Harvie says Fergus Ewing not bright as war of words continues
During this year's leadership contest, the MSP for Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch's campaign got off a rocky start, after Ms Forbes - a member of the socially conservative Free Church of Scotland – said she would not have voted for gay marriage had she been in parliament at the time.
The comments led to her losing support from key backers.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel