This article appears as part of the Unspun: Scottish Politics newsletter.
Edinburgh festivals are struggling to make ends meet.
In a column at the start of the month, Francesca Hegyi, the chief executive of the Edinburgh International Festival, said real-term support had dropped by 41% since 2009.
“The reality is that we are now stretched to breaking point.”
She pleaded with the Scottish Government, the local council and Creative Scotland for more money.
There are some good arguments for giving the festivals more taxpayers' cash.
“It’s difficult to understand the strategy of cutting back support to the festivals when their contribution is so profound,” Ms Hegyi wrote. “Put simply, for every £1 of public money invested in Edinburgh’s festivals, £33 is generated in return.”
The festivals and venues and programmers that put on shows every August are trapped in a pretty difficult place right now.
They have to cope with skyrocketing costs and keep ticket prices low enough to make sure they’re not pricing out their punters.
As Ms Hegyi said in her column, they’re having to rely more and more on their corporate sponsors.
But that isn’t without its problems.
By now you’ll likely be aware of the row over Edinburgh International Book Festival’s relationship with Baillie Gifford.
I won’t go into too much detail here, mostly because top colleague Vicky Allan has already written the best and most comprehensive column on the issue.
But, to quickly recap, last week 50 authors, including Ali Smith and Zadie Smith, put their names to an open letter criticising the partnership with the asset management firm due to its roughly £4.5bn investments in fossil fuels.
They’ve called on the Edinburgh Book Festival to find alternative sponsors for 2024 or face a boycott.
When asked about it on Tuesday, the First Minister came down firmly on the side of the corporate sponsor.
“I know for a fact that we would not have an Edinburgh International Book Festival if it wasn't for sponsors like Baillie Gifford and others,” he told the Holyrood Sources podcast.
“I think these things are absolutely a judgement call for the festival to make, but ultimately if they are on the journey to disinvestment in terms of fossil fuels, then I think that's a good thing.”
A cynic might suggest that given how tight things are for the government, given the demands on ministers from all sectors, Mr Yousaf is trying to head off demands from Reekie’s cultural overlords for new cash.
Unspun | Neil Mackay: Is anyone else sick to death of politicians at the Fringe?
At the end of the last year, when he was acting finance secretary, John Swinney told MSPs that Creative Scotland’s funding would be slashed from £69.3 million to £64.2m in the coming financial year.
We’re expecting the latest update on multi-year funding from the arts quango imminently.
In January, chief executive Iain Munro warned MSPs that many of the organisations looking to Creative Scotland for financing would be unsuccessful.
“We're now about to go beyond the tipping point. And when things are gone, they're gone, and it's very hard to recover from that,” he said.
There are difficult times ahead for the festivals and for Scotland’s arts scene.
I don’t envy those making the decisions at all.
...enjoyed the article? Sign up for free to the Unspun newsletter and receive it directly to your inbox every weekday night at 7pm. Click here 👈
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel