The SNP’s cabinet secretary responsible for energy and the wellbeing economy has called for a “faster acceleration” away from oil and gas despite huge fossil fuel revenues boosting Scotland’s economy.
The annual Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) figures, published by the Scottish Government show that the country’s deficit has improved from last year – with the net fiscal balance sitting at £19.1bn, equal to 9% of GDP.
Scotland’s geographical share of North Sea revenue was £9.4bn in 2022/23, up from £2.4 bn in 2021/22 after the start of the Energy Profits Levy or windfall tax.
The SNP’s cabinet secretary responsible for energy and wellbeing economy has acknowledged the oil and gas sector has “contributed significantly” to Scotland’s economy, but added that the potential of renewable energy to replace a move away from fossil fuels still needs to be “grasped”.
He added that a future independent Scotland “would have the powers to make different choices, with different budgetary results”.
Read more: Scotland's public finances improve thanks to surge in North Sea cash
Despite the North Sea oil and gas sector contributing significantly to Scotland’s improved fiscal position, the Scottish Government has signalled its intent to ramp up winding down the fossil fuels industry.
The Scottish Government’s draft energy strategy suggested accelerating the inevitable decline of the polluting oil and gas sector, with SNP ministers considering the findings of a consultation before publishing the final blueprint.
But Energy and Wellbeing Economy Secretary, Neil Gray, has suggested that despite the economic benefits of the industry, he is in favour of ramping up the speed of a transition away from fossil fuels – insisting that renewable energy can replace the revenue stream.
He said: “What I want to see is a faster acceleration of that just transition so we can reap the opportunity that’s coming from an economic perspective but also from a net-zero perspective.
“We’ve been clear on our position on new oil and gas licences.
“We don’t think that maximum and unlimited extraction is compatible with our net-zero ambitions. I think I described the Prime Minister’s intervention last week as extreme, I think it’s at the extreme end.
“We need to see a just transition. Our existing energy sector, oil and gas, is incredibly important in terms of investment opportunity but also in terms of the workforce, the skills, experience.”
Read more: Humza Yousaf warns his premiership will 'p*** people off'
But despite his criticism of the UK Government issuing new oil and gas licences, Mr Gray refused to say whether the controversial Rosebank development should be given the green light.
The Scottish Government has been routinely cricitised by climate activists for failing to oppose the Rosebank development, despite Nicola Sturgeon calling for the Cambo North Sea scheme not to be given the go-ahead.
Mr Gray said: “I don’t actually think that decision’s (Rosebank) been taken by the UK Government on Rosebank and it’s for them to decide upon it.
Read more: Revealed: SNP ministers who have met with oil giant behind Rosebank
“Whether we like it or not, oil and gas licencing continues to be reserved to the UK Government.
“We have said very clearly that we want to see more stringent climate compatibility checkpoints to ensure that any oil and gas operations can be consistent with our net-zero obligations.
“I stress again, oil and gas is going to be with us for some time to come.”
He added: “Obviously the oil and gas sector has contributed significantly not just to Scotland but to the public finances for the rest of the UK as well.
“What I want to see is the opportunity of renewables grasped.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel