Humza Yousaf's election as SNP leader is the “main culprit” in the slump in support for the SNP, according to the country’s top pollster.
Professor Sir John Curtice of the University of Strathclyde, said that the past year had been the most challenging for the party since it took office at Holyrood in 2007.
In an analysis, he wrote the resignation and arrest of Nicola Sturgeon and her husband Peter Murrell, who have since been released without charge, was not the main catalyst for the steep decline in the SNP’s poll ratings.
“Twelve months ago, the party stood on average at 45 per cent in polls of voting intention for Westminster — in line with the party’s performance in the 2019 UK election,” he wrote on the website Bylines Scotland.
READ MORE: SNP would risk Yousaf leadership by giving new vote on Greens deal
“Although Labour had overtaken the Conservatives as the second most popular party north of the border, it was still as much as 21 points behind and seemed no more than a distant threat.
“Yet in polls taken since the arrest of Sturgeon at the beginning of June, support for the SNP is down to 36 per cent — as weak a position as it has been at any stage since the 2014 referendum.”
Last month a survey published in The Sunday Times suggested that Labour was poised to overtake the SNP at the next Westminster election for the first time since 2010.
The Panelbase Poll indicated that Sir Keir Starmer’s party was in line to win 26 seats, a big rise from the one they hold now. If replicated at an election the SNP would lose more than half of their 45 seats.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond says Nicola Sturgeon a 'sad figure' who should keep quiet
Sir John claimed that projections for Holyrood suggest the SNP and Greens were in danger of losing their pro-independence majority in the chamber.
“Support for the SNP did ease a little to 43 per cent in the wake of the row about gender recognition, but no more than that, and was the level at which it stood when Sturgeon announced her resignation,” he said.
“Meanwhile, the arrest of Peter Murrell and the widespread publicity of the SNP’s financial difficulties to which it gave rise only saw a slight easing of SNP support – at least until the arrest of Sturgeon, which was followed by a two-point fall in SNP support to its current level of 36 per cent.
“That leaves one potential main culprit for the SNP’s current difficulties — the SNP leadership contest. It started with the SNP at 43 per cent in the polls. By the time the contest was coming to a conclusion, it had slipped to just below 40 per cent.
“Meanwhile, once Yousaf had been declared the winner it had slipped to between 38 per cent and 39 per cent.
“The election of a new party leader usually gives their party a boost in the polls – but of this, there was no sign at all following Yousaf’s success.”
He said that Mr Yousaf had a “relative lack of popularity” related to a lack of “charisma at the top that was provided by Salmond and Sturgeon”.
Mr Yousaf won the SNP election contest in April defeating second placed Kate Forbes, the former finance secretary, by 52% to 48% in the second round of voting. Former community justice minister Ash Regan came third.
During the campaign he was regarded as Nicola Sturgeon's choice as successor which was seen as giving him an advantage over his rivals.
In response, the SNP pointed to a recent poll, by Redfield & Wilton Strategies, which showed that support for the party had risen by two points to 37 per cent at Westminster, and by three points in the Holyrood constituency vote to 36 per cent, putting it ahead of Labour.
Keith Brown, the party’s depute leader, said: “This poll shows that people across Scotland continue to back the SNP and our positive vision for Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel