An investigation has found steps to protect a vulnerable Scot who died while under the influence of another person were “not taken”.
The person, known anonymously as “AB”, had learning disabilities and physical ill health and died in hospital after being under the influence of another person for several years.
The investigation was led by the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland (MWC), who published a report into AB’s treatment.
There were “multi-agency” concerns about the impact of the individual’s influence on AB and the MWC found action could have been taken to ensure there were protections in place for them.
The report also concluded that access to needed treatments was impeded up to the time of their death.
READ MORE: Watchdog reprimands health board after staff share patient information on WhatsApp
AB’s identity was kept anonymous, as is the case with all MWC investigations.
The investigation heard that AB’s family, social work, health services and others had previously raised concerns surrounding their wellbeing.
This led to AB being subject to three adult support and protection investigations and two periods of detention in hospital under the Mental Health Act in the five years leading up to their death.
The MWC made six recommendations for change jointly to the NHS health board and local authority involved in the case as well as one recommendation to Scottish Government.
Suzanne McGuinness, executive director of social work for MWC, said: “This is a very distressing case, where a vulnerable person was isolated from their family by another individual over many years, to their personal detriment.
“It resulted in increased poor health and an early death. Despite opportunities, no effective intervention which would have changed AB’s circumstances was made.
“Our recommendations for change cover social work and health care, but they also address the issue of legal authority and power of attorney, recognising that someone who may lack capacity for decision making about their health or welfare needs may be under the undue influence of another person.”
She added: “It is vital that this report is shared, read and discussed in detail by social work, mental health and general health services across Scotland, and by legal services.
“We believe there are lessons to be learned across the country and we hope this in-depth report will help raise awareness of the importance of identifying where undue influence may exist and the legislative frameworks which can be used to avoid similar situations in future.”
The Scottish Government and NHS were unable to comment.
Show less
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here