The news that Victoria, Australia has pulled out of hosting the Commonwealth Games has sparked talk that the event could return to Scotland.
Glasgow hosted the games in 2014 to wide acclaim, with with CGF chief executive Mike Hooper declaring the games the best ever.
First Minister Humza Yousaf has stated that he's open to the possibility of the games returning 12 years later.
He said on STV: “First of all, I’m really disappointed in the news.
“We were desperate for the games to go ahead in 2026, given that we know how excellent the preparations have been going for Team Scotland, it’s also an opportunity for us to compete under the Scottish banner.
“Let’s see what the art of the possible may be. As I said, I have noted the comments from others that Scotland could look to be part of something bigger, part of a multi-city, multi-country host.
“So, I’ve seen those comments. I’ve asked my team to explore whether that’s a possibility or not, but it may be difficult, but let’s see what the art of the possible is.”
Glasgow already has a velodrome after hosting in 2014 and both Murrayfield in Edinburgh and Hampden Park could be used for potential venues.
However, hosting the event would not come cheap with Victoria pulling out after declaring that the costs were "well and truly too much" for the state to bear.
Read More: Scotland to explore hosting Commonwealth Games in joint bid – Humza Yousaf
Organisers had initially expected the event to cost around £1.4bn but said projected costs were now over £3bn.
In addition Birmingham, which hosted the Commonwealth Games last year, could be in contention again with Conservative members of the council arguing for it to host permanently with much of the infrastructure already in place.
Since 1998 the games have only been held outside of the UK or Australia once, with Delhi hosting in 2010, and some have suggested the future of the event itself could be in question.
Should Scotland aim to host? Have your say in our poll.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel