Diverting serious sexual offenders to therapy and community service instead of prosecution could be halted after the Lord Advocate questioned whether the method is “being used appropriately”.
A review has been ordered after the Sunday Mail reported a teenage girl whose alleged rapist avoided a criminal trial.
The 14-year-old, Kaitlyn Ward, who is now 17, told the paper that her alleged attacker being offered diversion from prosecution left her “feeling like there isn’t a justice system at all” and was “a complete kick in the teeth”.
Now Ms Bain has called for a review of the policy in recognition of the impact it can have on victims of crime.
Read more: SNP to abolish not proven verdict and set up sexual offences court
But concerns have been raised that the authorities have been “effectively shamed” into reviewing the process by victims speaking out.
As the head of the prosecution service and member of the Scottish Government, the Lord Advocate has expressed her deep concern for those impacted by sexual crimes and her determination to improve their experience of the criminal justice system.
Diversion from prosecution is one of a range of community justice interventions prosecutors will consider.
Its application is guided by the Scottish Prosecution Code and its use for offenders under the age of 18 is in keeping with obligations to children in terms of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).
In diversion, an offender is referred by the Crown Office to local authority social work services or a partner agency for support, treatment, or other action to address the underlying causes of the alleged offending and prevent further criminality.
Read more: Scottish Government bids to make drug possession for personal use legal
Ms Bain said: “Sexual offences are among the most difficult cases prosecutors deal with. I am acutely aware of the trauma experienced by victims and their loved ones. As public prosecutors, we are trusted to make appropriate decisions and must uphold the trust placed in us.
“Diversion can be an appropriate intervention to prevent perpetrators re-offending which, in turn, builds towards a safer society for all. Addressing needs which have contributed to offending behaviour is in the interest of the wider community. Such intervention can be particularly effective in cases of children’s offending, changing the direction of young lives for the better."
She added: “I have instructed this review as there is a responsibility on COPFS and criminal justice partners to ensure that diversion is being used appropriately. The review is timely in ensuring we are continuing to consider the rights of children under UNCRC guidance.
“The review will engage with victims and listen closely to their views. It will also involve our partners across the criminal justice system. Justice for victims will always remain the focus of what we do.”
Read more: Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on record
The Crown Office said it will publish revised guidance on diversion for sexual offences in the prosecution code in due course.
Scottish Conservative shadow justice secretary Russell Findlay, said: “These brave victims should be commended for speaking out but they should not have needed to do so. They’ve effectively shamed the authorities into ordering this review.
“Diversions from prosecution were supposed to deal with low-level crimes but have resulted in dangerous criminals – many of them repeat offenders – being let off the hook.
“The SNP is so pathetically weak on crime that some victims even wonder why they bothered reporting what happened to them in the first place. That is damning.
“If this review is to have any chance of succeeding then victims must be at the heart of any discussions and proposed changes.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel