World number three Daniil Medvedev eased into his maiden Wimbledon quarter-final after Jiri Lehecka was forced to retire injured.
The 27-year-old Russian was in control on Court One and had just gone two sets ahead at 6-4 6-2 when his Czech opponent pulled out.
Lehecka received treatment during a medical timeout at the end of the opening set but initially battled on in some discomfort before opting for a premature departure.
A maiden #Wimbledon quarter-final awaits, @DaniilMedwed 🙌 pic.twitter.com/p3eIgD8qdJ
— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 10, 2023
Medvedev awaits either world number five Stefanos Tsitsipas or American Christopher Eubanks in the last eight.
“I honestly did not (realise) until he retired,” he said of Lehecka’s injury.
“I saw that maybe his movement is a little bit restricted but the way he was throwing the ball I thought that it was not causing him enough trouble but then when he retired, I was like, ‘OK, I see it different’.
“I feel sorry for Jiri. Hopefully he can recover fast and he has a lot more grand slams to come ahead of him.”
Only at #Wimbledon 😅 pic.twitter.com/omls2pmWdo
— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 10, 2023
Lehecka showed some touches of class but his performance was undermined by a series of errors and, ultimately, his fitness issue.
The 21-year-old struggled to deal with the power of Medvedev, with one of his returns of serve flying off court and landing in a spectator’s drink.
Both players were then forced to sit down during the sixth game of the second set due to a medical emergency in the crowd.
Jiri Lehecka was hampered by injury (Adam Davy/PA)
The affected spectator eventually walked out of the arena with the aid of medics following a delay of around 10 minutes.
Speaking about reaching the last eight at SW19 for the first time, Medvedev added: “It’s probably my fifth or sixth Wimbledon and I was not very successful but I never lost on this court.
“I feel sorry that all the quarters are going to be played on Centre (Court). I’m like, ‘can I just continue here?’.
“I’m really happy and looking forward to the next match.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here