Labour has backtracked on its £28 billion green prosperity plan, saying “economic stability” must come first if it wins the next election.
Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said the opposition could not commit to spending figures until the financial situation it would inherit becomes clearer.
The party had promised in 2021 to invest £28 billion a year until 2030 in green projects if it came to power.
But Ms Reeves told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Friday that figure would instead be a target to work towards, not the amount allocated to the plan during the first year of government.
She said after the Tories had “crashed our economy,” leading to soaring interest rates and high inflation, it would be crucial to show “responsibility” with borrowing.
READ MORE: SNP MSPs tell FM to make transport a Cabinet post to tackle ferries
Ms Reeves appeared to admit that the proposals risked spooking the markets in a similar way Liz Truss’s disastrous mini-budget had.
She refused to say how much investment in the plan there would be in the first year of government, saying: “I will never be reckless with the public finances. Economic stability, financial stability, always has to come first and it will do with Labour.
“That’s why it’s important to ramp up and phase up our plans to get to the investment we need to secure these jobs so that it is also consistent with those fiscal rules to get debt down as a share of GDP and to balance day-to-day spending.”
Ms Reeves, pictured below, insisted that Ed Miliband, the shadow net zero secretary, was “on the same page” as her.
The Tories said shadow ministers had realised the policy would lead to “disaster” and sought to stress that Labour’s ultimate goal remained to reach the £28 billion figure, which it said would worsen the economy.
Conservative Party chairman Greg Hands said: “Keir Starmer’s main economic policy is in tatters, after even he and Rachel Reeves realised it would lead to disaster.
“It doesn’t matter if they try and pretend otherwise, Labour’s plan remains to stick £28 billion of borrowing on the Government credit card which will lead to higher inflation and higher interest rates.”
Labour’s flagship green prosperity plan, billed as the party’s answer to Joe Biden’s clean energy-promoting Inflation Reduction Act, included pledges to invest more in projects such as wind and carbon capture.
But its fiscal rule – that debt must be falling as a share of national income after five years – has always been the party’s priority, Ms Reeves argued.
Asked whether the commitment potentially could have got into Labour into “the same difficulties” as Ms Truss last year, she replied: “Which is why I always said our fiscal rules would always be non-negotiable because they are the rock of stability upon which everything else is built.”
Labour would instead seek to hit the £28 billion target towards the second half of the next Parliament, she added.
The shadow chancellor also hit out at Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s trip to Washington in which he and US President Mr Biden announced an agreement to deepen UK-US ties.
Hopes of a full-blown trade deal have been abandoned but the new “declaration” by the two leaders includes commitments to allow UK companies access to US green tax credits.
Ms Reeves, who visited the US herself last month, said she was “staggered” that Mr Sunak had returned with “no industrial plan for Britain”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel