Our benefits system recognises the need to provide for people who are too sick to work, while separately supporting those with long-term conditions to manage their elevated living costs. Two benefits are available. One is means-tested income support for those who are “off sick”. The other is a payment to mitigate the extra costs of living with an impairment or health condition (Adult Disability Payment or Personal Independence Payment).
Reflecting their distinct purposes, in the UK 0.8 million people receive disability support only, and 1 million receive means-tested support only. It is that 1m who could be about to face a terrifying dip in their income amid collapsing living standards. This is because the UK Government is proposing to scrap the Work Capability Assessment (WCA).
The infamous assessment determines whether a claimant is entitled to receive a top-up of their benefit, worth £390 per month. The proposal will remove this top-up. Instead, a health top-up will be available to those in receipt of disability support. Those whose health prevents them from working, but who do not claim benefits based on "disability", will receive no additional support. These will be claimants experiencing health shocks, mental health difficulties and fluctuating conditions who do not qualify for disability benefit, or who do not consider themselves "disabled".
There will be two exemptions, pregnancy risk and ongoing cancer treatment. Crucially, transitional protection will limit cliff-edge scenarios, but the unavoidable conclusion is a dramatic loss of support for many, who will be left with the daunting prospect of managing on less than half of what is currently considered enough. A typical single claimant will see their income restricted to £368 monthly.
The Government’s stated aim is to incentivise work. A commitment has been made to introduce a personalised approach to the agreement that claimants have with the JobCentre about the steps that they will take to find work, or to increase earnings. However, just 4% of claimants who have undergone the WCA feel that they could return to work immediately if the right job were available. Research conducted by the Institute for Fiscal Studies demonstrates that losing disability benefit income causes persistent increases in relative poverty, even as employment rates go up. JobCentre work coaches dealing with specific local challenges and without occupational health expertise will be expected to deliver more.
Logically, to access the new health top-up, people who hadn’t considered it will seek to claim disability benefit. Demand and need for ADP will increase. Many will not meet the criteria and will lose out. It’s not a coincidence that the size of the group impacted is equivalent to the number of people expected to be new disability-related benefit claimants by 2026.
Our concern is whether scrapping the WCA is simply a route to further entrenching the inequality associated with the growth in those living with a health condition. Denying adequate support to those with restricted ability to work will essentially force people to look for work before they are ready. Trapping people in unsuitable and poor-quality work does not lead to a healthier, wealthier nation. Stripping back the safety net is not the solution to the problems with the WCA. These proposals will not be introduced before 2026. We urge the Government to use this time to re-think them.
Erica Young works in the Social Justice team at Citizens Advice Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel