THE rise of the internet has made it easier for misinformation to spread, including hoax medical cures.
But the history of bad medicine is littered with examples of false remedies and dangerously misunderstood drugs.
Snake Oil
The term 'snake oil salesmen' is used today as a catch-all term to cover anyone selling fraudulent health products, but in 19th Century America consumers were sold 'cure-all' ointments and lotions said to contain actual snake oil obtained from boiling rattlesnakes.
The craze is believed to have derived from Chinese medicine which has used oil from Chinese water-snakes for centuries as a treatment for arthritis and other joint pains.
Recent scientific research suggests there is some health benefit to this due to its very high Omage-3 fatty acid content.
However, there is no evidence of any benefit from rattlesnake oil and, in many cases, products touted as 'snake oil' actually contained a mix of other animal fats and petroleum.
Heroin as cough medicine
In 1895, a new drug called dimorphine (better known today as heroin) was hailed as being five times more effective – but much less addictive – than morphine.
Drug company, Bayer pharmaceuticals, began selling heroin-laced aspirin in the US in 1898 which it marketed towards children suffering coughs, colds, and sore throats.
By 1912 is was gaining popularity as a recreational drug, and was soon banned.
Electricity
In the late 1700s, physicians were eager to prescribe electrotherapy as a cure for just about everything, from epilepsy and blindness to tapeworms, kidney stones or haemorrhoids.
Some unfortunate patients with toothaches were even given a jolt of electricity in a bid to ease their pain.
Carrots
In his late 1740s tome 'An Easy and Natural Method of Curing Most Diseases', British evangelist John Wesley suggested “a fortnight on boiled carrots only” to treat asthma.
Malaria 'cure'
In 3rd Century Rome, one physician treated his malaria patients by telling them to write Abracadabra over and over on a piece of paper before attaching to a necklace, wearing it for nine days, then tossing the paper into an east-flowing stream.
If that failed, they had to rub themselves in lion fat instead.
📝 Sign up for the Inside the NHS newsletter where each week our health correspondent Helen McArdle exclusively breaks down vital statistics, issues in healthcare and provides a platform to those on the NHS frontlines who are too reluctant to speak publicly. Click here to sign up! 👈
Bleach?
The pandemic became a fountain of misinformation for Covid cures, but in April 2020 there was widespread disbelief when President Donald Trump appeared to suggest that bleach could be injected into people to fight the virus.
Disinfectant poisonings in the US subsequently rose by 121%.
'Miracles' do happen
There are genuine cases of "spontaneous regression" in cancer. Around one in 100,000 cancer patients appear to 'heal themselves' without treatment, although rates are more common in some childhood cancers such as neuroblastoma.
Over the centuries it is likely that a few of these cases will have overlapped with patients given 'miracle cures', but modern research suggests the phenomenon is probably rooted in rare immune system responses.
One study showed that 90% of patients who had spontaneously recovered from leukaemia had suffered another illness, such as pneumonia, shortly before.
Other research has uncovered links between tumours disappearing and cases of diphtheria, gonorrhoea, hepatitis, influenza, malaria, measles, smallpox and syphilis.
It is thought that the immune response triggered by these infections may create conditions for 'cell suicide', triggering the cancer to kill itself.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here