THE expression "psychological safety" isn’t something everyone’s talking about, yet – but HR professionals are increasingly in tune with it, and it’s starting to filter into everyday thinking this winter as we contend with what can often feel like a growing list of issues.
While we can’t control outside events, we can make our workplaces more human. Work can – and should – be somewhere people can feel fulfilled, stimulated and supported.
Psychological safety is widely defined as “allowing people to flourish at work without fear of retribution for mistakes or setbacks”.
The key word there is "fear" – one of the biggest contributors to low wellbeing. I think I speak for most when I say we’ve all had quite enough of fear over the past few years. Microsoft has even suggested we are amid a “human energy crisis” and I think that sums it up perfectly.
Fear – whether it’s of failure, your boss or of losing your job – can lead to poor productivity, chronic self-doubt, exhaustion, overwhelm, and a serious risk of burnout. Many are already anxious enough as they try to make ends meet, without daily work life adding to an already heavy load.
Psychological safety is the opposite of fear. It’s being in a team that has your back, and knowing you can (respectfully) challenge the status quo or share concerns without negative repercussions.
There are benefits for employers too when people feel psychologically safe. They will be more creative and productive, and there will likely be less conflict between team members.
For leaders who already know this, most probably assume they are running a psychologically safe workplace. But are they really? And how can they find out?
We are undoubtedly seeing more organisations move towards addressing employee wellbeing, but some of the most common initiatives – such as "mental health days" or free access to mindfulness apps – are akin to putting a sticking plaster on what could become a gaping wound.
I’m not disputing these have their place, but they won’t have much impact if the person has to return to the same problems that caused them to need time off in the first place. They also don’t make the organisation examine the root causes of excessive stress and fear.
To make a real difference to wellbeing, we need bigger changes, like tackling excessive workload or issues like bullying.
To identify those, listening is key – and no matter how psychologically safe your workplace is, there are always going to be some who don’t feel comfortable speaking out when they have an audience.
One way for leaders to address this is through online engagement platforms, where workers can voice their concerns digitally, in an employee-only space. If they can do this anonymously, even better.
No matter how you’re planning to listen, how you phrase questions is also important. If you ask an employee if they are feeling stressed, they will probably say "no". If you ask them, ‘How can I help you?’ or ‘What can I do to make things easier for you?’, they are more likely to open up.
Knowing they will be helped rather than judged – so, psychologically safe – encourages people to seek support sooner, with positive results for employees and employers alike.
Amanda Kerley is Chief Operating Officer at Trickle
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel