Security guard David Smith had an “ongoing relationship” with Russia and was paid for his “treachery”, a senior judge has ruled.
The 58-year-old Scot gathered secret documents and passed them on to Russian authorities while working as a security guard at the British embassy in Germany.
He was caught following an undercover operation in 2021 and has admitted eight charges under the Official Secrets Act.
Ahead of his sentencing at the Old Bailey, Mr Justice Wall ruled on the defendant’s motivation.
In his ruling on Thursday, Mr Justice Wall said Smith was motivated by “his antipathy towards this country” and intended to damage the UK’s interests by his actions.
READ MORE: Wild beavers released at Loch Lomond marking major milestone in species return
The judge dismissed the former RAF serviceman’s explanation that he only wanted to “embarrass” his employers because he was angry at his treatment and to highlight poor security.
Mr Justice Wall told the court: “I did not find him to be a witness of truth in general terms.”
He said Smith had not addressed some questions when he gave evidence at the Old Bailey and some of his answers were “incredible”.
The judge also dismissed Smith’s case that he only provided information to Russian military attaches twice, saying: “I am sure the relationship was in place for some time in 2020.
“I am also sure in the period before that, in 2018 to 2019, the defendant was collecting information from the embassy with a view to passing it on at some stage. No other explanation makes sense.”
Smith was snared in an undercover sting in August 2021 involving two fake Russian operatives – a Russian defector, Dmitry, who handed a document to the British embassy, and Russian intelligence officer, Irina, who accosted the defendant about it afterwards.
READ MORE: Russia flies nuclear bombers over sea north of Scotland
Smith was caught on camera talking to himself about Dmitry as he recorded his visit from CCTV, saying: “If he works at the embassy they will know him.”
Mr Justice Wall said: “These words must mean that he was going to provide the images (of Dmitry) to someone at the Russian embassy to view so they can investigate.
“I reject the idea he might simply have destroyed it … This was not a spur of the moment decision to do something and then think about it later.
“It was a concerted effort to get as much information relating to this visit as possible.
“He collected this material to pass on to his Russian contact.”
The judge said the filming of private areas of the embassy and identifying colleagues’ offices in June 2021 was not done “in drink on the spur of the moment” as Smith had claimed.
He said: “I am sure that it was done either under direction or at a time when the defendant had a relationship with someone from the Russian embassy and was done carefully in order to further that relationship.”
The judge also rejected Smith’s claim that he was living off the sale of military memorabilia at German flea markets.
He said it was a “safe conclusion” that he had another form of income from 2020 onwards from his activities with the Russian embassy.
The judge said Smith’s claim he wanted to embarrass embassy staff was “illogical”.
He went on: “Similarly, I reject his suggestion in evidence that he was acting in a befuddled way because of his poor mental health and regular consumption of alcohol.
“There is no logical causal connection between personal depression and betraying one’s country.
“He set about his various tasks in a calm and logical fashion.”
Mr Justice Wall said: “I am driven to the conclusion that the main motivation for the defendant to act as he did was because he felt antipathy to the United Kingdom and wanted to damage this country’s interests by providing information to a state which at that time – as now – was regarded as unfriendly.”
The judge said the reason for Smith’s “hostility” to Britain was unclear but that was the impression he gave to people who knew him.
He made negative comments about the UK in his evidence to the court, referring to its “skulduggery” in international affairs.
And at one stage he had openly supported the Russian-backed forces in the Donbas region of Ukraine, where is his wife is from.
The judge said the only explanation for the reason why Smith did not resign from the embassy he hated was his desire to use his job to further the assistance he was providing to Russia.
Mr Justice Wall said he would sentence Smith on the basis he had an “ongoing relationship with someone at the Russian embassy” and did not just supply information to Russia on two isolated occasions.
The judge said: “He was paid for his treachery and he was motivated by his antipathy towards this country and intended to damage this country’s interests by acting as he did.”
Smith, who is originally from Paisley, Scotland, will be sentenced on Friday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article