Campaigners fighting to save Glasgow tower blocks from demolition lobbied city planners calling on them “to do the right thing.”
Wyndford Residents Union said an open letter which was sent to Glasgow City Council had not been responded to for two weeks. Today they personally handed the letter to Glasgow City Council planners at their George Street offices.
The residents union is fighting the demolition of four tower blocks in the Wyndford area of Maryhill. Owners Wheatley Homes Glasgow wants to replace them with 300 mid-sized homes.
Read more: Wyndford tower blocks: Bid for listed status is refused
While residents believe retrofitting would be the ‘greener’ option, a recent report said there was no evidence to retain the flats on environmental grounds.
Campaigners opposing the demolition of four blocks, 120, 151, 171 and 191, have been occupying the buildings for several weeks and say the city council has it in their gift to call for an environmental impact assessment.
Nick Durie, of the Wyndford Residents Union, said: “We note that the housing association’s gelignite agenda will see three 26 storey tower blocks adjacent to a major wildlife corridor in the Kelvin Walkway - a well known haven for bat roosts (a protected species) - bombed, yet despite the obvious potential for disruption of the natural environment the council has not requested an environmental impact assessment.
"This is really quite difficult to understand, as such requests are routine in large developments which impact far less on the natural environment. It is within the council's gift to request such an environmental impact assessment, and indeed the planning authority seems deeply remiss in not doing so."
Read more: Budget cuts: Fears the axe could fall on Scots library services
The group claims said that due to the council's failure to provide any meaningful response to their open letter, they decided to present the letter coupled with their demand for an environmental impact assessment to the council.
Mr Durie added: “It is clear that there are some very strange irregularities with the planning department when it comes to the association’s gelignite agenda for the Wyndford. Glasgow City Council is hosting a high-profile conference on retrofitting of buildings. We consider this extremely ironic due to the disinterested attitude exhibited by the council towards our easily retrofitted Wyndford high flats."
Earlier this week the heritage body responsible for the care and protection of Scotland's historic buildings said the flats did not meet listed criteria.
A spokesman for Historic Environment Scotland said: "Our assessment found that the buildings do not meet the criteria of special architectural or historic interest required for listing. While the blocks have some importance in the context of post-war housing provision, our assessment concludes that they are not early, unusual or rare examples of their building type, and that they have also been substantially remodelled."
Mr Durie said despite the response from HES, they will continue their fight for the flats and a public meeting is planned for February 11.
Caz Rae, of the residents union, said they are continuing to support residents in the occupied flats.
She said: "There are around 100 people who remain in the flats and they are pledging to stay. Some have been offered alternatives but are just not suitable."
Angie Thompson has lived on the Wynford estate for more than 45 years.
While not in a tower block she lives close to number 120 and doesn't want to see them come down.
"If people are living in them they can't be unsafe so why not retrofit them," Mrs Thompson said. "The flats are part of Wyndford and I would be sorry to see them go."
Wheatley Homes Glasgow plans to demolish four multi-storey blocks with 300 new homes to be built in their place. Scotland’s largest social landlord announced plans to invest £73million in Wyndford, more than a year ago.
A Glasgow City Council spokesman said: “The council intends to adopt a EIA screening opinion on the proposed demolition- this is a formal process to decide whether an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) would be required. The EIA screening process is an opportunity for both parties to ensure that EIA is only undertaken for those projects which are likely to have significant effects on the environment. For this process to be properly informed, we’ve requested Wheatley Group to submit further supporting information.
“We have also requested a timescale from Wheatley Group for submission of the requested screening information, and for submission of the application for Prior Approval for demolition. A Prior Approval application for the demolition would not be determined until an EIA Screening Opinion has been adopted by the council.
Tenant chair of Wheatley Homes Glasgow, Bernadette Hewitt, said: “Tenants have made their voices and feelings very clear. The overwhelming majority of local tenants are fully behind these regeneration plans and are very excited about creating a bright new future for their community.
“These plans will see £73 million invested in Wyndford, building around 255 homes for social rent and 45 for mid-market rent. These homes will use the latest building technology to create one of Scotland’s leading net zero developments.
“A report by a leading UK environmental and sustainability architect has made clear there is little or no basis to argue for the retention of the existing blocks on the grounds of either energy efficiency or CO2(e) emissions. Also, a report by structural engineers demonstrated cutting through the thick concrete walls would compromise the structural integrity and stability of these buildings.
“Tenants will continue to work alongside award-winning architects to shape the new-look community, which will include more green spaces for the community, larger family-friendly homes which are more energy-efficient and will help tenants reduce their energy bills.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel