HE was born to be king and certainly served a long apprenticeship for the role given his mother’s remarkable 70-year reign.
Unlike the late Queen, his grandfather George VI and great-grandfather George V, Charles’s destiny from birth was to one day become monarch.
His mother was 10-years-old before she became first in line to the throne when her father became George VI following the abdication his brother Edward VIII in 1936. And even George V was a spare heir whose accession to the throne after his father Edward VII only became after the death of his brother Prince Albert. He was first in line, but died in 1892.
Read more: Could Prince Harry's new book Spare force brothers further apart?
For King Charles III it is almost a case of history repeating itself. His accession to the throne after decades of waiting in the wings and followed a monarch for whom there was much admiration and support. How would the new king be received and what would be the issues which his reign would need to confront?
It was a similar story for the early reign of his great great grandfather Edward VII. He finally became king after the 63-year reign of his mother Queen Victoria. And while his reign might only have been less than 10 years, the playboy prince ultimately considered an ambassador for his country.
Both Edward VII and now Charles’ reigns come after a period of great change and for Charles there is the question of how the monarchy fits with the Scottish independence debate.
In a recent report by Robert Hazell, founder and first director of the Constitution Unit at University College London, on Future Challenges for the Monarchy, he says the next big challenge is the threat of an increasingly disunited kingdom. Days after becoming King, he toured Wales, Scotland and North Ireland and in Edinburgh the Lord Lyon King of Arms read the proclamation of the new King to the people of Scotland at the Mercat Cross. It was met with some boos on the Royal Mile.
According to the report, Charles’s tour of the nations was seen by some as a bid to save the union and says if his loyalty is judged to be with his larger kingdom, could it push for a debate on a Scottish republic?
It said: “If the Scottish government succeeds in a future attempt to hold a second independence referendum, can the monarchy remain neutral? The 2014 referendum was famously an occasion when the Queen’s usually impeccable neutrality seemed to slip for a moment. As someone who has been proclaimed King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, can Charles pretend to be unconcerned if he becomes King of a ‘Lesser Britain’? The standing of the monarchy will inevitably be damaged, even if responsibility for the break-up lies with the politicians and not the monarch. So it will be hard to stand idly by, but a greater risk to the monarchy would be to allow itself to be co-opted by unionist politicians, as Liz Truss attempted to do when she sought to join Charles’s inaugural tour of the nations.
“It will be small consolation that the SNP wishes to retain the monarchy, so that an independent Scotland would become one of the realms, with Charles as its head of state. That would be a hard role to fulfil if the break-up leads to a difficult divorce, as with Brexit, with Charles trying to remain above the divisions of his fractious kingdoms. In addition the SNP has long had a fundamentalist wing who have no time for the monarchy; if the Scottish people sense that Charles’s primary loyalty is to his larger kingdom, they may press for an early referendum on becoming a republic.”
Read more: Glasgow warm hubs open their doors as cost of living crisis bites
In October King Charles conferred city status on Dunfermline, an ancient capital of Scotland, after carrying out his first official visit as monarch. During a short walkabout in the city, a burial place for medieval kings including Robert the Bruce, who fought off an English invasion 700 years ago, the King was greeted by large crowds.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said Scotland and Dunfermline were “deeply honoured” the couple had chosen the city for their first official joint visit since the Queen’s death at Balmoral in September.
Hazell’s report concluded that Charles can and has developed his own style. It added: “In his ceremonial role as head of the nation, Charles introduced some important innovations upon accession: in his televised address to the nation, his tour of the home nations, and early meeting with parliament. He can also develop his own style through his patronage of organisations, the causes he supports, and the institutions he chooses to visit, while being less outspoken than when he was Prince of Wales.
“The main challenge to the monarchy lies in the threat to the union. If Scotland votes to become independent, that will damage the monarchy’s standing, even though responsibility will lie with the politicians. If some of the 14 other realms where Charles is now head of state decide to become republics the monarchy may privately be relieved. It would reduce the workload, and the risk of reputational damage.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel