NHS Highland has been ordered to apologise to a patient who suffered serious complications after waiting more than three years for bowel surgery.
A report by the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) said the health board's own investigation into the patient's complaint was of "poor quality" and "failed to acknowledge the significant and unreasonable delays" suffered.
The delays led 'Patient C' to develop a severe hernia which left them unable to work, reliant on welfare benefits, and requiring riskier and more complex surgery than originally planned.
The watchdog criticised NHS bosses for blaming Covid for the delays when the patient had been ready for surgery since December 2018, and said there had been "no sense of urgency" despite "the gravity of C's situation".
The report said: "It is of significant concern that the Board has failed to fully acknowledge the consequences of the delays and the adverse effects upon C's physical and mental health as a result.
"The consequences for C of these delays cannot and should not be underestimated."
READ MORE: Forth Valley placed in special measures amid repeated safety warnings
Patient C's ordeal began in January 2018 when they underwent emergency surgery to remove a section of their bowel and create a stoma - an opening in the bowel.
In April 2018, at an outpatient's appointment, Patient C was told the stoma could be reversed subject to a flexible sigmoidoscopy taking place - a procedure to examine the inside of the bowel using a tiny camera.
This went ahead eight months later, in December 2018. The SPSO said this was an "unreasonable" length of time given that average wait times are under three months, and was partly due to NHS Highland's use of a named person waiting list - whereby a specific doctor carries out certain procedures.
The watchdog said this did not make sense when the sigmoidoscopy could have been carried out "by any competent endoscopist" and called on NHS Highland to "urgently review their use of named person waiting lists to ensure they are being appropriately utilised and managed".
By December 2019 - a year on from the sigmoidoscopy - Patient C's GP contacted Raigmore Hospital in Inverness to raise concerns that they were still awaiting an appointment date for surgery.
In January 2020, Patient C attended an outpatient clinic where it was noted that they had developed an abdominal hernia.
By October 2021, with their condition "increasingly complicated", Patient C had still not been given a date for surgery.
NHS Highland blamed the pandemic blamed for stalling elective procedures, but a consultant colorectal surgeon who advised the SPSO said there "appears to be a lack of orderly prioritisation...to ensure that non-cancer elective cases, such as C's case, are appropriately prioritised".
READ MORE: Debate future of NHS or face inevitable slide into privatisation by stealth
Figures from Public Health Scotland show that, by the end of September this year, there were 7,650 patients on NHS inpatient and day case lists who had been waiting more than two years for an elective procedure.
Patient C was eventually given a date for surgery at a hospital in Glasgow in March 2022, but the operation was called off due to staff shortages.
The procedure to reverse the stoma and repair the hernia was finally carried out in Glasgow in June 2022.
A spokesman for NHS Highland said: "We fully accept the recommendations of the report and are very sorry for the failures identified in our care for this patient.
"Our Chief Executive will be writing to the patient to apologise and explain what has been put in place since this happened. The report has also been shared with our teams."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel