A HEART FULL OF HEADSTONES
Ian Rankin
(Orion, £22)
It’s a testament to Ian Rankin’s fertile imagination, and his patience, that it’s taken him 24 Rebus books to bring out the twist of putting his protagonist on trial. That’s the teaser for A Heart Full of Headstones: after putting countless criminals behind bars, Rankin’s gruff, pragmatic detective is himself in the dock. The rest of the book recounts the events that put him there.
Rebus books are always dark, but this is more sombre and funereal than most, a mood reflected in its autumnal cover art. The retired copper is ailing, suffering chest pains and dizzy spells and requiring frequent puffs on an inhaler for his COPD. There’s the sense that dark clouds are gathering, and that all the times in his career that Rebus has bent and broken the rules are finally about to catch up with him. “He’d broken laws and skewed evidence and taken bungs, arrested guilty people for crimes they hadn’t committed when he couldn’t hold them to account for the ones they’d actually carried out. He’d used his fists and his feet as weapons of intimidation.” And his arch-nemesis, former gangland boss Cafferty, seems set to nudge things in just the right direction to destroy Rebus once and for all.
Cafferty reaches out to the detective, hiring him to track down Jack Oram, a former employee he ran out of town years earlier for ripping him off. With his life almost over, it seems that the old gangster wants to apologise and make amends. Meanwhile, elsewhere in Edinburgh, events are taking place that will intersect with Rebus’s unofficial investigation in troubling ways.
His protégé, DI Siobhan Clarke, is handling the case of an unpleasant copper named Haggard, who has been arrested for domestic abuse. His defence – that he was suffering from PTSD from working at the notorious Tynecastle police station, and that he’s willing to go on the record about the “culture of corruption” there – sends shockwaves through Police Scotland. Clarke’s pursuit of the truth brings her face to face with the sinister, misogynistic Tynecastle “Crew”, as well as Haggard’s wife and her sister, who have close ties to businessmen whose activities may not be entirely legal.
Stretching from penthouses overlooking the Meadows to lock-ups in Sighthill, Rebus’s and Clarke’s separate investigations prove to have some elements in common, but Rebus’s links, however tangential, with the Tynecastle Crew put him in a precarious position. The higher-ups favour the idea of making an example of older, retired officers and letting the younger ones off the hook, and the fact that two of the Tynecastle police name Rebus as a bent copper intrigues his old sparring partner, DI Malcolm Fox. Siobhan Clarke is finding her faith in her old mentor tested, as she becomes increasingly uneasy about how Rebus’s transgressions have continually been indulged, and Rebus himself is haunted by misgivings that he was ever held up as someone to aspire to.
As always, Rankin’s plotting is fiendishly clever, his characterisation exemplary and his sense of time and place precise and authentic. Set just as Edinburgh was coming back to life after the pandemic, it leaves one convinced that Rankin must have trawled the city’s streets to note the exact location of every roadwork and diversion.
In its sombre majesty, this tale of reckonings is one of the highlights of the Rebus canon, loaded with omens of things irreparably falling apart, but nevertheless leaving us with a sneaking suspicion that Rankin might be able to put it all together again for one last fling.
ALASTAIR MABBOTT
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here